Literature DB >> 20490876

Determinants of the intention for using a lumbar support among home care workers with recurrent low back pain.

Pepijn D D M Roelofs1, Mireille N M van Poppel, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Willem van Mechelen.   

Abstract

In most effectiveness studies on lumbar supports for patients with low back pain, insufficient data are reported about adherence. In a secondary preventive RCT, we found beneficial effects and a good adherence among home care workers with low back pain. To target the use of lumbar supports on those patients who can benefit optimally from usage, we need to know why people are adherent. We used the attitude, social support and self-efficacy model to identify determinants for prolonged adherence to wearing a lumbar support. The strongest predictor for intending sustained use of a lumbar support was a positive attitude towards lumbar supports, explaining 41% of the variance (B = 1.31; p < 0.001). Social support and self-efficacy played a minor role. The intention for prolonged use of a lumbar support for workers with recurrent back pain was mainly explained by a positive attitude. The discomfort of a lumbar support was outweighed by perceived benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490876      PMCID: PMC2989292          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1399-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  8 in total

1.  Feasibility of lumbar supports for home care workers with low back pain.

Authors:  P Jellema; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; M N M Van Poppel; R M D Bernsen; B W Koes
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; J C Norcross
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-09

3.  Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology.

Authors:  R M Cross
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2004-09-22

4.  Wearing an abdominal belt increases diastolic blood pressure.

Authors:  W Rafacz; S M McGill
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Musculoskeletal pain in the Netherlands: prevalences, consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study.

Authors:  H S J Picavet; J S A G Schouten
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Lumbar supports to prevent recurrent low back pain among home care workers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Pepijn D D M Roelofs; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Mireille N M van Poppel; Petra Jellema; Sten P Willemsen; Maurits W van Tulder; Willem van Mechelen; Bart W Koes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 7.  Lumbar supports for prevention and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  I C D van Duijvenbode; P Jellema; M N M van Poppel; M W van Tulder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

8.  A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.961

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2010.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.