Literature DB >> 20490655

A gene expression signature identifies two prognostic subgroups of basal breast cancer.

Renaud Sabatier1, Pascal Finetti, Nathalie Cervera, Eric Lambaudie, Benjamin Esterni, Emilie Mamessier, Agnès Tallet, Christian Chabannon, Jean-Marc Extra, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Patrice Viens, Daniel Birnbaum, François Bertucci.   

Abstract

Prognosis of basal breast cancers is poor but heterogeneous. Medullary breast cancers (MBC) display a basal profile, but a favorable prognosis. We hypothesized that a previously published 368-gene expression signature associated with MBC might serve to define a prognostic classifier in basal cancers. We collected public gene expression and histoclinical data of 2145 invasive early breast adenocarcinomas. We developed a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier based on this 368-gene list in a learning set, and tested its predictive performances in an independent validation set. Then, we assessed its prognostic value and that of six prognostic signatures for disease-free survival (DFS) in the remaining 2034 samples. The SVM model accurately classified all MBC samples in the learning and validation sets. A total of 466 cases were basal across other sets. The SVM classifier separated them into two subgroups, subgroup 1 (resembling MBC) and subgroup 2 (not resembling MBC). Subgroup 1 exhibited 71% 5-year DFS, whereas subgroup 2 exhibited 50% (P = 9.93E-05). The classifier outperformed the classical prognostic variables in multivariate analysis, conferring lesser risk for relapse in subgroup 1 (HR = 0.52, P = 3.9E-04). This prognostic value was specific to the basal subtype, in which none of the other prognostic signatures was informative. Ontology analysis revealed effective immune response (IR), enhanced tumor cell apoptosis, elevated levels of metastasis-inhibiting factors and low levels of metastasis-promoting factors in the good-prognosis subgroup, and a more developed cell migration system in the poor-prognosis subgroup. In conclusion, based on this 368-gene SVM model derived from an MBC signature, basal breast cancers were classified in two prognostic subgroups, suggesting that MBC and basal breast cancers share similar molecular alterations associated with aggressiveness. This signature could help define the prognosis, adapt the systemic treatment, and identify new therapeutic targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490655     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0897-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  127 in total

Review 1.  Role of MTA2 in human cancer.

Authors:  Kyle R Covington; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  IDO is highly expressed in breast cancer and breast cancer-derived circulating microvesicles and associated to aggressive types of tumors by in silico analysis.

Authors:  M T Isla Larrain; M E Rabassa; E Lacunza; A Barbera; A Cretón; A Segal-Eiras; M V Croce
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  The Big Data Revolution for Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Issam Ibnouhsein; Stéphane Jankowski; Karl Neuberger; Carole Mathelin
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-04-01

4.  Targeting thyroid hormone receptor beta in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Guowei Gu; Luca Gelsomino; Kyle R Covington; Amanda R Beyer; John Wang; Yassine Rechoum; Kenneth Huffman; Ryan Carstens; Sebastiano Andò; Suzanne A W Fuqua
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  A transcriptomic insight into the impacts of mast cells in lung, breast, and colon cancers.

Authors:  Eun-A Ko; Kenton M Sanders; Tong Zhou
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  High-throughput molecular analysis from leftover of fine needle aspiration cytology of mammographically detected breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Annaratone; Caterina Marchiò; Tommaso Renzulli; Isabella Castellano; Daniela Cantarella; Claudio Isella; Luigia Macrì; Giovanna Mariscotti; Davide Balmativola; Elisabetta Cantanna; Cristina Deambrogio; Francesca Pietribiasi; Riccardo Arisio; Fernando Schmitt; Enzo Medico; Anna Sapino
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Expression of the MHC Class II Pathway in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Cells Is Associated with a Good Prognosis and Infiltrating Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Andres Forero; Yufeng Li; Dongquan Chen; William E Grizzle; Katherine L Updike; Natalie D Merz; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Todd C Burwell; Christos Vaklavas; Donald J Buchsbaum; Richard M Myers; Albert F LoBuglio; Katherine E Varley
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 11.151

8.  Identification of prognosis-relevant subgroups in patients with chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Da Yu; Rui Zhu; Ming Zhan; Angel A Rodriguez; Wei Yang; Stephen Wong; Andreas Makris; Brian D Lehmann; Xi Chen; Ingrid Mayer; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Zhi-Ming Shao; W Fraser Symmans; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Obesity and overfeeding affecting both tumor and systemic metabolism activates the progesterone receptor to contribute to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Erin D Giles; Elizabeth A Wellberg; David P Astling; Steven M Anderson; Ann D Thor; Sonali Jindal; Aik-Choon Tan; Pepper S Schedin; Paul S Maclean
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease.

Authors:  Giampaolo Bianchini; Justin M Balko; Ingrid A Mayer; Melinda E Sanders; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.