Literature DB >> 20490565

Tissue apposition system: new technology to minimize surgery for endoscopically unresectable colonic polyps.

C P Delaney1, B J Champagne, J M Marks, L Sanuk, B Ermlich, A Chak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is the first clinical series using the Tissue Apposition System (TAS) device in a feasibility study of polypectomy as an alternative to laparoscopic colectomy (LC) for endoscopically unresectable polyps. TAS is a novel T-tag system for endoscopic placement of sutures, facilitating closure of larger defects from advanced endoluminal or transluminal endoscopic procedures. Such novel instrumentation may reduce risk and accelerate recovery.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, patients with endoscopically unresectable polyps who would otherwise require LC were enrolled. The polyp site was visualized by colonoscopy and resected with laparoscopic assistance, using endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection. After confirming benign disease by frozen section, the polypectomy site was closed by TAS under laparoscopic observation to avoid injury to surrounding structures. Follow-up colonoscopy was performed at 3 months.
RESULTS: Seven patients were recruited (5 men; mean age, 66 years). Polyps were from 20 to 50 (mean, 30) mm in diameter; six were in the right colon, and three were on the mesenteric border of the bowel. All final pathology was benign. Mean EMR time was 29 min, mean time taken for TAS was 37 min, and mean total operative time was 199 min. Two TAS procedures required conversion to LC (one unresectable polyp and one device failure). Five TAS procedures were completed, with a mean hospital stay of 1.2 days, and no complications. Follow-up colonoscopy revealed healing without polyp recurrence in any case. One patient (initial 5-cm sigmoid polyp) developed a very mild clinically asymptomatic stricture in the sigmoid colon.
CONCLUSIONS: This initial human experience demonstrates that TAS can be used safely in the colon under laparoscopic control. TAS permits safe closure of defects after endoscopic polypectomy of selected and otherwise unresectable polyps. Such technology may potentially avoid the need for LC and permit rapid recovery with short hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490565     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1098-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

Review 1.  Emerging technologies including robotics and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Mark H Whiteford; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  A balancing view: should large colon polyps be removed colonoscopically or surgically?

Authors:  Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Con: colonoscopic resection of large neoplastic lesions is appropriate and safe.

Authors:  Roy Soetikno; Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Is closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection truly needed?

Authors:  M Matsushita; N Danbara; M Omiya; K Uchida; A Nishio; K Okazaki
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 5.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of colon polyps.

Authors:  J D Waye
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07

Review 6.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of colonic lesions: current applications and future prospects.

Authors:  David M Poppers; Gregory B Haber
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Maria Alessandra Filograna; Serafina Lattarulo; Angela Pezzolla; Gennaro Fabiano; Nicola Palasciano; Ippazio Ugenti
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

8.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 cases of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Naila Arebi; David Swain; Noriko Suzuki; Chris Fraser; Ashley Price; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  A comparative study of 50% dextrose and normal saline solution on their ability to create submucosal fluid cushions for endoscopic resection of sessile rectosigmoid polyps.

Authors:  Panagiotis Katsinelos; Jannis Kountouras; George Paroutoglou; Grigoris Chatzimavroudis; Christos Zavos; Ioannis Pilpilidis; George Gelas; Dimitris Paikos; Konstantinos Karakousis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps: 10-year experience and follow-up.

Authors:  Dirk Wilhelm; Stefan von Delius; Lars Weber; Alexander Meining; Armin Schneider; Helmut Friess; Roland M Schmid; Eckart Frimberger; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  Current evidence in gastrointestinal surgery: natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper.

Authors:  Byron F Santos; Eric S Hungness
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Minimally invasive approaches for the management of "difficult" colonic polyps.

Authors:  R Alejandro Cruz; Madhu Ragupathi; Rodrigo Pedraza; T Bartley Pickron; Anne T Le; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-06-28

4.  Giant rectal villous adenoma: Surgical approach with rectal eversion and perianal coloanal anastomosis.

Authors:  Renato Roriz-Silva; Alexei Almeida Andrade; Ivan Gregório Ivankovics
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-17

5.  Closure of iatrogenic large mucosal and full-thickness defects of the stomach with endoscopic interrupted sutures in in vivo porcine models: are they durable enough?

Authors:  Masakuni Kobayashi; Kazuki Sumiyama; Yamato Ban; Akira Dobashi; Tomohiko Richard Ohya; Daisuke Aizawa; Shinichi Hirooka; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.