Literature DB >> 20490528

The significance of fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age.

Mustafa Ozat1, Mine Kanat-Pektas, Tayfun Gungor, Beril Gurlek, Mete Caglar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to establish a more sensitive nomogram of fetal sacral length measurements, as well as to specify the accuracy of fetal sacral length for the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age.
METHODS: The present study investigated a total of 2,184 pregnant women who were referred for routine pregnancy follow-up. All of the reviewed women had uncomplicated singleton pregnancies without known structural and chromosomal fetal anomalies.
RESULTS: A statistically significant linear relationship was established between sacrum length and gestational age [gestational age = 4.49 + 0.92 × sacrum length (r = 0.98, R (2) = 0.96)]. The rate of increase in sacrum length of fetuses with a gestational age of < 28 weeks was formulated as [gestational age = -0.05 + 1.01 × sacrum length (r = 0.96, R (2) = 0.98)], while the same formula was [gestational age = -0.09 + 1.32 × sacrum length (r = 0.94, R (2) = 0.96)] for fetuses with a gestational age of ≥ 28 weeks. On the other hand, a statistically significant correlation was found to exist between biparietal diameter (r = 0.68, P = 0.001), head circumference (r = 0.590, P = 0.001), femur length (r = 0.719, P = 0.001) and sacrum length (r = 0.696, P = 0.001). However, the same statistically significant correlation exists between abdominal circumference and the other sonographic measurements (r = 0.223, P = 0.375).
CONCLUSIONS: The fetal sacral length appears as an easily acquired and valuable parameter, which directly and strongly correlates with gestational age and other biometrical measurements. Therefore, fetal sacral length may be utilized as a complementary tool in both the evaluation of fetal growth and prediction of gestational age. Further research is required to determine the significance of fetal sacral length in prenatal follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490528     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1510-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  4 in total

1.  Normal development of sacrococcygeal centrum ossification centers in the fetal spine: a postmortem magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Nan Jian; Mi-Mi Tian; Lian-Xiang Xiao; Hui Zhao; Yan Shi; Guan Li; Shuai Zhang; Xiang-Tao Lin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The morphometrical and topographical evaluation of the superior gluteal nerve in the prenatal period.

Authors:  Alicja Kędzia; Krzysztof Dudek; Marcin Ziajkiewicz; Michal Wolanczyk; Anna Seredyn; Wojciech Derkowski; Zygmunt Antoni Domagala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Second and third trimester estimation of gestational age using ultrasound or maternal symphysis-fundal height measurements: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Self; Lama Daher; Michael Schlussel; Nia Roberts; Christos Ioannou; Aris T Papageorghiou
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.331

4.  Fetal kidney length as a useful adjunct parameter for better determination of gestational age.

Authors:  Mete G Ugur; Aynur Mustafa; Huseyin C Ozcan; Neslihan B Tepe; Huseyin Kurt; Emre Akcil; Reyhan Gunduz
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.484

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.