| Literature DB >> 20490306 |
S B Wankhede1, A Prakash, B Kumari, S S Chitlange.
Abstract
Three simple, accurate and economical methods have been developed for the estimation of norfloxacin and ornidazole in tablet dosage form. First method is based on the simultaneous equations, wavelengths selected for analysis were 273.0 nm (lambda(max) of norfloxacin) and 318.5 nm (lambda(max) of ornidazole), respectively, in 0.1N NaOH. Second method is Q-analysis method, based on absorbance ratio at two selected wavelengths 297.0 nm (iso-absorptive point) and 318.5 nm (lambda(max) of ornidazole). Third method is first order derivative spectroscopy using 297.5 nm (zero cross for norfloxacin) and 264.0 nm (zero cross for ornidazole). The linearity was obtained in the concentration range of 4-20 mug/ml and 5-25 mug/ml for norfloxacin and ornidazole, respectively. The results of the analysis have been validated statistically and by recovery studies.Entities:
Keywords: Norfloxacin; Q-analysis; derivative spectroscopy; ornidazole; simultaneous equation
Year: 2009 PMID: 20490306 PMCID: PMC2865798 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.56026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0250-474X Impact factor: 0.975
Fig. 1Overlain spectra of norfloxacin and ornidazole.
Overlain spectra of norfloxacin (NF, 273 nm) and ornidazole (OZ, 318.5 nm)
ANALYSIS OF TABLET FORMULATION
| Method | Component | Label Claim (mg/tab) | Amount Found | Estimated Label Claim | SD | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | NF | 400 | 398.89 | 99.73 | 0.5932 | 0.5948 |
| OZ | 500 | 496.60 | 99.32 | 0.8720 | 0.8780 | |
| B | NF | 400 | 396.51 | 99.13 | 0.6855 | 0.6915 |
| OZ | 500 | 498.89 | 99.78 | 0.7358 | 0.7374 | |
| C | NF | 400 | 400.10 | 100.03 | 0.7842 | 0.7840 |
| OZ | 500 | 498.62 | 99.68 | 0.9286 | 0.9316 |
Average of six determinations, SD is standard deviation and CV is coefficient of variation.
RESULTS OF RECOVERY STUDIES
| Level of Recovery (%) | Amt. of Pure | Method-A | Method-B | Method-C | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drug Added (mg) | % Recovery | % Recovery | % Recovery | |||||
| NF | OZ | NF | OZ | NF | OZ | NF | OZ | |
| 80 | 64 | 80 | 99.41 | 99.98 | 98.32 | 100.80 | 99.49 | 99.49 |
| 100 | 80 | 100 | 99.65 | 99.94 | 98.49 | 100.91 | 99.22 | 99.55 |
| 120 | 96 | 120 | 99.80 | 99.65 | 98.57 | 100.76 | 100.31 | 99.57 |
| Mean % Recovery | 99.62 | 99.86 | 98.46 | 100.82 | 99.81 | 99.53 | ||
| SD | 0.2147 | 0.2910 | 0.1578 | 0.2231 | 0.6711 | 0.7216 | ||
| CV | 0.2155 | 0.2914 | 0.1603 | 0.2213 | 0.6724 | 0.7250 | ||
| SE | 0.0877 | 0.1188 | 0.0644 | 0.0911 | 0.2740 | 0.2946 | ||
SD is standard deviation, CV is coefficient of variation and SE is standard error.