Literature DB >> 20488871

Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers.

John Albertini1, Connie Mayer.   

Abstract

For over 30 years, teachers have used miscue analysis as a tool to assess and evaluate the reading abilities of hearing students in elementary and middle schools and to design effective literacy programs. More recently, teachers of deaf and hard-of-hearing students have also reported its usefulness for diagnosing word- and phrase-level reading difficulties and for planning instruction. To our knowledge, miscue analysis has not been used with older, college-age deaf students who might also be having difficulty decoding and understanding text at the word level. The goal of this study was to determine whether such an analysis would be helpful in identifying the source of college students' reading comprehension difficulties. After analyzing the miscues of 10 college-age readers and the results of other comprehension-related tasks, we concluded that comprehension of basic grade school-level passages depended on the ability to recognize and comprehend key words and phrases in these texts. We also concluded that these diagnostic procedures provided useful information about the reading abilities and strategies of each reader that had implications for designing more effective interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488871     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enq017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  3 in total

1.  Reading Function and Content Words in Subtitled Videos.

Authors:  Izabela Krejtz; Agnieszka Szarkowska; Maria Łogińska
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-16

2.  Association of Hearing Impairment With Neurocognition in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.

Authors:  Johnnie K Bass; Wei Liu; Pia Banerjee; Tara M Brinkman; Daniel A Mulrooney; Amar Gajjar; Alberto S Pappo; Thomas E Merchant; Gregory T Armstrong; Deokumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Line breaks in subtitling: an eye tracking study on viewer preferences.

Authors:  Olivia Gerber-Morón; Agnieszka Szarkowska
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 0.957

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.