Literature DB >> 20488773

The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.

H Haned1, L Pène, F Sauvage, D Pontier.   

Abstract

We propose to quantify the accuracy of a likelihood-based estimator that was recently proposed for the determination of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture, when genetic data alone is considered [H. Haned, L. Pène, J.R. Lobry, A.B. Dufour, D. Pontier, Estimating the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures: does maximum likelihood perform better than maximum allele count? J. Forensic Sci., in press]. Using Bayes' theorem, we derive a formula for the calculation of the predictive value (PV) of the likelihood-based estimator. The PV gives the probability that a DNA stain contains the DNAs of i people given that the maximum likelihood estimator gave an estimate of i contributors for this stain. We illustrate the PV calculations for two different types of DNA evidence: traces and body fluids. The PV varied according to the number of contributors involved in the DNA stain. Setting the maximum number of possible contributors to five, the lowest predictive values were scored for five-person mixtures with a minimum value of 0.26 for traces, but values were always above 0.94 for stains comprising one, two or three contributors, for both traces and body fluids. Values remained relatively high for four-person mixtures with a minimum value of 0.69. These findings confirm that likelihood-maximization is a powerful approach for the determination of the number of contributors to forensic DNA mixtures.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488773     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  4 in total

1.  Estimating the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing DNA in high template and low template amounts.

Authors:  Jaheida Perez; Adele A Mitchell; Nubia Ducasse; Jeannie Tamariz; Theresa Caragine
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 2.  A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Corina Benschop; John Buckleton; Øyvind Bleka; Duncan Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Internal Validation of MaSTR™ Probabilistic Genotyping Software for the Interpretation of 2-5 Person Mixed DNA Profiles.

Authors:  Michael S Adamowicz; Taylor N Rambo; Jennifer L Clarke
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Current developments in forensic interpretation of mixed DNA samples (Review).

Authors:  Na Hu; Bin Cong; Shujin Li; Chunling Ma; Lihong Fu; Xiaojing Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2014-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.