Literature DB >> 20488468

Trimethoprim in vitro antibacterial activity is not increased by adding sulfamethoxazole for pediatric Escherichia coli urinary tract infection.

Hiep T Nguyen1, Richard S Hurwitz, W Robert Defoor, Eugene Minevich, Alexander J McAdam, Joel E Mortensen, Susan M Novak-Weekley, Brian J Minnillo, Jack S Elder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The combination of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole is often used to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections in children. The rationale for combining trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole is that they may act synergistically to increase antibacterial activity. However, approximately 3% of patients show allergic reactions to sulfamethoxazole, of which some are serious (liver failure and Stevens-Johnson syndrome). We determined whether adding sulfamethoxazole is necessary to increase in vitro antibacterial activity for pediatric urinary tract infection compared to that of trimethoprim alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively identified 1,298 children with urinary tract infection (greater than 100,000 cfu/ml Escherichia coli) from a total of 4 American regions. In vitro susceptibility of bacterial isolates to sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was determined using disk diffusion. Ampicillin susceptibility was tested at 2 sites. At 1 site all uropathogens from consecutive urinary isolates were evaluated.
RESULTS: E. coli susceptibility to trimethoprim was 70%, comparable to the 70% of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (p = 0.9) and higher than the 56.9% of sulfamethoxazole (p <0.05). This susceptibility pattern was without regional differences. At 2 sites susceptibility to trimethoprim was significantly higher than to ampicillin. At 1 site the susceptibility of other uropathogens to trimethoprim and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was similar to that of E. coli.
CONCLUSIONS: In children with urinary tract infection in vitro susceptibility to trimethoprim was comparable to that to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and significantly higher than to sulfamethoxazole. This finding was similar at all sites. Adding sulfamethoxazole appears unnecessary and may represent a risk to patients. Trimethoprim can be used as an alternative to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole based on in vitro antibacterial susceptibility. Routine trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use for urinary tract infection should be carefully reevaluated. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488468     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  3 in total

1.  [Treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in childhood].

Authors:  I Körner; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Bacterial conversion of folinic acid is required for antifolate resistance.

Authors:  Sam Ogwang; Hoa T Nguyen; Marissa Sherman; Saralee Bajaksouzian; Michael R Jacobs; W Henry Boom; Guo-Fang Zhang; Liem Nguyen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  [Resistance testing for urinary tract infections. A barrier to guideline implementation].

Authors:  G Schmiemann; J Noll; F Hoffmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.