Literature DB >> 20488322

Carotid artery stent fracture identification and clinical relevance.

Gioacchino Coppi1, Roberto Moratto, Jessica Veronesi, Emanuele Nicolosi, Roberto Silingardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to identify the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of carotid artery stent fracture.
METHODS: Commercially available carotid stents were implanted in this prospective, observational study that began in January 2004. Indications included asymptomatic patients (stenosis >80%), symptomatic patients (stenosis >60%), and ulcerated lesions (>50%). Stent integrity was assessed with plain radiography at 12 months. Data were analyzed in April 2009 on a series of 341 consecutive patients treated with carotid artery stenting with at least 12 months follow-up.
RESULTS: Stent fracture prevalence was 3.4% at 12 months (95% confidence interval, 1.7%-6.1%). The median clinical follow-up was 30 months (range, 12-64 months) for 323 eligible patients. Treatment included 23.6% of symptomatic patients. According to univariate analysis, calcification type III increased the odds of stent fracture by more than 4.5 times (odds ratio [OR], 4.74; P = .006) and angulation >45 degrees increased the odds of stent fracture by 6.5 times (OR, 6.51; P = .008). Carotid stent cell type, stent length, and stent over-sizing were not correlated with stent fracture incidence. Stent fracture was not associated with stroke (0%), transient ischemic attack (0%), or death (0%). Restenosis was significantly associated with stent fracture (P < .001). Multivariate analysis evidenced that type III calcification (OR, 3.90; P = .029) and angulation >45 degrees (OR, 4.69; P = .026) were important risk factors for carotid stent fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid stent fracture is a rare complication after CAS and is associated with vessel angulation, calcification, and restenosis. In this series, fracture identification was independent of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and mortality. Copyright (c) 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488322     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  5 in total

1.  Delayed tine Displacement of a CASPER Carotid Artery Stent due to Styloid Process Compression.

Authors:  Daren Tan; Matthew Thomas Crockett; Albert Ho Yuen Chiu
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.649

2.  Delayed cerebral infarction due to stent folding deformation following carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Kwon-Duk Seo; Kyung-Yul Lee; Byung Moon Kim; Sang Hyun Suh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Failed carotid artery stenting followed by successful surgical intervention: Case report.

Authors:  Valentin Govedarski; Elitsa Dimitrova; Zornitsa Vassileva; Svetoslav Dimitrov; Svetoslav Iovev
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 0.332

4.  Self-Expanding Metallic Stent Fracture in the Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Authors:  Chuanguo Zhou; Baojie Wei; Jianfeng Wang; Qiang Huang; Hui Li; Kun Gao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  Quantitative comparison between carotid plaque hardness and histopathological findings: an observational study.

Authors:  Daisuke Fukushima; Kosuke Kondo; Naoyuki Harada; Sayaka Terazono; Kei Uchino; Kazutoshi Shibuya; Nobuo Sugo
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.196

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.