Literature DB >> 20488248

Spatially sparse source cluster modeling by compressive neuromagnetic tomography.

Wei-Tang Chang1, Aapo Nummenmaa, Jen-Chuen Hsieh, Fa-Hsuan Lin.   

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography enables non-invasive detection of weak cerebral magnetic fields by utilizing super-conducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). Solving the MEG inverse problem requires reconstructing the locations and orientations of the underlying neuronal current sources based on the extracranial measurements. Most inverse problem solvers explicitly favor either spatially more focal or diffuse current source patterns. Naturally, in a situation where both focal and spatially extended sources are present, such reconstruction methods may yield inaccurate estimates. To address this problem, we propose a novel ComprEssive Neuromagnetic Tomography (CENT) method based on the assumption that the current sources are compressible. The compressibility is quantified by the joint sparsity of the source representation in the standard source space and in a transformed domain. The purpose of the transformation sparsity constraint is to incorporate local spatial structure adaptively by exploiting the natural redundancy of the source configurations in the transform domain. By combining these complementary constraints of standard and transformed domain sparsity we obtain source estimates, which are not only locally smooth and regular but also form globally separable clusters. In this work, we use the l(1)-norm as a measure of sparsity and convex optimization to yield compressive estimates in a computationally tractable manner. We study the Laplacian matrix (CENT(L)) and spherical wavelets (CENT(W)) as alternatives for the transformation in the compression constraint. In addition to the two prior constraints on the sources, we control the discrepancy between the modeled and measured data by restricting the power of residual error below a specified value. The results show that both CENT(L) and CENT(W) are capable of producing robust spatially regular source estimates with high computational efficiency. For simulated sources of focal, diffuse, or combined types, the CENT method shows better accuracy on estimating the source locations and spatial extents than the minimum l(1)-norm or minimum l(2)-norm constrained inverse solutions. Different transformations yield different benefits: By utilizing CENT with the Laplacian matrix it is possible to suppress physiologically atypical activations extending across two opposite banks of a deep sulcus. With the spherical wavelet transform CENT can improve the detection of two nearby yet not directly connected sources. As demonstrated by simulations, CENT is capable of reflecting the spatial extent for both focal and spatially extended current sources. The analysis of in vivo MEG data by CENT produces less physiologically inconsistent "clutter" current sources in somatosensory and auditory MEG measurements. Overall, the CENT method is demonstrated to be a promising tool for adaptive modeling of distributed neuronal currents associated with cognitive tasks. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20488248      PMCID: PMC2914202          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom.

Authors:  S Baillet; J J Riera; G Marin; J F Mangin; J Aubert; L Garnero
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.

Authors:  J C Mosher; P S Lewis; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Distributed current estimates using cortical orientation constraints.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; John W Belliveau; Anders M Dale; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Intrinsic oscillations of neocortex generated by layer 5 pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  L R Silva; Y Amitai; B W Connors
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.

Authors:  A Molins; S M Stufflebeam; E N Brown; M S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction.

Authors:  Stefan Haufe; Vadim V Nikulin; Andreas Ziehe; Klaus-Robert Müller; Guido Nolte
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui; C M Michel; D Lehmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  MEG and EEG auditory responses to tone, click and white noise stimuli.

Authors:  M Reite; J T Zimmerman; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-06
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Ultrafast inverse imaging techniques for fMRI.

Authors:  Fa-Hsuan Lin; Kevin W K Tsai; Ying-Hua Chu; Thomas Witzel; Aapo Nummenmaa; Tommi Raij; Jyrki Ahveninen; Wen-Jui Kuo; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Imaging brain source extent from EEG/MEG by means of an iteratively reweighted edge sparsity minimization (IRES) strategy.

Authors:  Abbas Sohrabpour; Yunfeng Lu; Gregory Worrell; Bin He
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.

Authors:  Wei-Tang Chang; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Electrophysiological Source Imaging: A Noninvasive Window to Brain Dynamics.

Authors:  Bin He; Abbas Sohrabpour; Emery Brown; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 9.590

5.  Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Authors:  Rasheda Arman Chowdhury; Giovanni Pellegrino; Ümit Aydin; Jean-Marc Lina; François Dubeau; Eliane Kobayashi; Christophe Grova
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Whole-head rapid fMRI acquisition using echo-shifted magnetic resonance inverse imaging.

Authors:  Wei-Tang Chang; Aapo Nummenmaa; Thomas Witzel; Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; Kevin Wen-Kai Tsai; Ying-Hua Chu; Jonathan R Polimeni; John W Belliveau; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Improving the spatial resolution of magnetic resonance inverse imaging via the blipped-CAIPI acquisition scheme.

Authors:  Wei-Tang Chang; Kawin Setsompop; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Thomas Witzel; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  s-SMOOTH: Sparsity and Smoothness Enhanced EEG Brain Tomography.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jing Qin; Yue-Loong Hsin; Stanley Osher; Wentai Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.