Literature DB >> 2048810

Distribution of ventilation and perfusion with different modes of mechanical ventilation.

D D Valentine1, M D Hammond, J B Downs, N J Sears, W R Sims.   

Abstract

We compared pulmonary gas exchange during synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV), pressure support ventilation (PSV), and airway pressure release ventilation (APRV). Nine subjects aged 56 to 75 yr were studied from 4 to 19 h after cardiac operations. When subjects were ready to be weaned from mechanical ventilation their ventilation-perfusion distribution was estimated using the multiple inert gas elimination technique during SIMV. The subjects then received PSV and APRV during alternating periods on a randomized basis, and the gas-exchange measurements were repeated. Vasoactive infusions and inspired oxygen fraction were held constant throughout the investigation. The results indicated that the major characteristics of the main mode of the VA/Q distributions (mean, standard deviation, and skew) were similar during all three modes. Dead space was lower during APRV (30.1 +/- 1.7% [SEM]) than during SIMV (36.2 +/- 1.5%) and PSV (37.1 +/- 2.7%) (p less than 0.05). Right-to-left shunt was significantly greater during APRV (19.9 +/- 2.3%) than during SIMV (15.4 +/- 1.7%) (p less than 0.05). Peak airway pressure (Paw) was higher during SIMV (32.8 +/- 1.3 cm H2O) than both PSV (19.4 +/- 2.1 cm H2O) and APRV (14.3 +/- 1.0 cm H2O) (p less than 0.05). Minute ventilation was lower during APRV (7.5 +/- 0.07 L/min) than during SIMV (9.4 +/- 0.6 L/min) and PSV (9.0 +/- 0.5 L/min) (p less than 0.05). Hemodynamic variables were similar during all three modes. We conclude that all three modes provide acceptable oxygenation and ventilatory support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2048810     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/143.6.1262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  4 in total

Review 1.  Airway pressure release ventilation and biphasic positive airway pressure: a systematic review of definitional criteria.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Martyn Hawkins
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Applications of airway pressure release ventilation.

Authors:  Jahan Porhomayon; A A El-Solh; Nader D Nader
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.584

3.  Biphasic positive airway pressure ventilation (PeV+) in children.

Authors:  A S Jaarsma; H Knoester; F van Rooyen; A P Bos
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 4.  Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal.

Authors:  Penny Andrews; Joseph Shiber; Maria Madden; Gary F Nieman; Luigi Camporota; Nader M Habashi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.