Literature DB >> 20486506

Salivary and free serum cortisol evaluation.

Christopher Duplessis1, Dominick Rascona, Malford Cullum, Eric Yeung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiologic free serum cortisol may more accurately reflect adrenal function than total cortisol levels. Salivary cortisol estimates free serum cortisol. We researched the clinical viability of salivary cortisol in hospitalized patients.
METHODS: Free serum cortisol, and salivary cortisol were measured via ELISA in hospitalized and outpatient patients.
RESULTS: We obtained 37/71 satisfactory saliva samples from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The correlation between free serum, and salivary cortisol over all collected samples was 0.914 (p < 0.001). We identified disparate interpretations for adrenal insufficiency (AI) utilizing total versus free serum cortisol.
CONCLUSIONS: Salivary cortisol is an acceptable surrogate for free serum cortisol when satisfactory salivary volumes are procured. Due to inadequate sample volumes, and contamination, it should not be generally adopted in the ICU. We identified discordance between free and total cortisol in interpreting AI, suggesting reinterpretation of seminal trials investigating physiologic corticosteroid replacement on the basis of total cortisol levels. The analysis of both free serum cortisol via ultrafiltration and salivary cortisol involved two steps: sample centrifugation followed by ELISA, suggesting consideration of widespread adoption of free serum cortisol in future investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20486506     DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  5 in total

1.  Are we correctly diagnosing adrenal insufficiency or are we just spitting into the wind?

Authors:  Lara P Nelson; Barry P Markovitz
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 2.  Regulation of cortisol bioavailability--effects on hormone measurement and action.

Authors:  Ilias Perogamvros; David W Ray; Peter J Trainer
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Exploring the complexity of cardiometabolic risk in women.

Authors:  Jo Lynne W Robins; Nancy L McCain; R K Elswick
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.522

4.  Effects of hormonal contraceptive phase and progestin generation on stress-induced cortisol and progesterone release.

Authors:  Alexandra Ycaza Herrera; Sophia Faude; Shawn E Nielsen; Mallory Locke; Mara Mather
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2019-03-05

5.  Brain activity during a post-stress working memory task differs between the hormone-present and hormone-absent phase of hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Alexandra Ycaza Herrera; Ricardo Velasco; Sophia Faude; Jessica D White; Philipp C Opitz; Ringo Huang; Kristie Tu; Mara Mather
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2020-08-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.