UNLABELLED: Previous reports document transient improvements after daily zolpidem (CAS 82626-48-0) in patients with brain damage. This multi-patient study evaluates the response to zolpidem in neurologically disabled patients, using 99mTcHMPAO brain SPECT scans and clinical rating scales. METHOD: 23 of 41 consecutive adult patients, at least 6 months after brain damage were identified as neurologically disabled patients by scoring less than 100/100 on the Barthel Index. Causes of their brain damage included stroke (n = 12), traumatic brain injury (n = 7), anaphylaxis (n = 2), drugs overdose (n = 1) and birth injury (n = 1). The selected 23 patients had a baseline 99mTcHMPAO brain SPECT scan before starting daily zolpidem therapy and a second within two weeks of therapy, performed 1 h after 10 mg oral zolpidem. Scans were designated as improved when at least two of three assessors detected improvement after zolpidem. The rest were designated non improved. After four months daily zolpidem therapy, patients were rated on the Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale (TFES) before and after zolpidem. The TFES ratings were compared using a Wilcoxon non parametric signed rank test. Scan improvers were compared with non improvers, using a two sample t test with unequal variance. RESULTS: Mean overall improvement after zolpidem on TFES was 11.3%, from 73.4/100 to 62.1/100 (p = 0.0001). 10/23 (43%) patients improved on SPECT scan after zolpidem. Their mean TFES improvement was 19.4% (+/- 16.75) compared with 5.08% (+/- 5.17) in 13/23 non improvers (p = 0.0081). CONCLUSION: This prospective study adds further evidence to previous reports of zolpidem efficacy in patients with established brain damage.
UNLABELLED: Previous reports document transient improvements after daily zolpidem (CAS 82626-48-0) in patients with brain damage. This multi-patient study evaluates the response to zolpidem in neurologically disabled patients, using 99mTcHMPAO brain SPECT scans and clinical rating scales. METHOD: 23 of 41 consecutive adult patients, at least 6 months after brain damage were identified as neurologically disabled patients by scoring less than 100/100 on the Barthel Index. Causes of their brain damage included stroke (n = 12), traumatic brain injury (n = 7), anaphylaxis (n = 2), drugs overdose (n = 1) and birth injury (n = 1). The selected 23 patients had a baseline 99mTcHMPAO brain SPECT scan before starting daily zolpidem therapy and a second within two weeks of therapy, performed 1 h after 10 mg oral zolpidem. Scans were designated as improved when at least two of three assessors detected improvement after zolpidem. The rest were designated non improved. After four months daily zolpidem therapy, patients were rated on the Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale (TFES) before and after zolpidem. The TFES ratings were compared using a Wilcoxon non parametric signed rank test. Scan improvers were compared with non improvers, using a two sample t test with unequal variance. RESULTS: Mean overall improvement after zolpidem on TFES was 11.3%, from 73.4/100 to 62.1/100 (p = 0.0001). 10/23 (43%) patients improved on SPECT scan after zolpidem. Their mean TFES improvement was 19.4% (+/- 16.75) compared with 5.08% (+/- 5.17) in 13/23 non improvers (p = 0.0081). CONCLUSION: This prospective study adds further evidence to previous reports of zolpidem efficacy in patients with established brain damage.
Authors: Noble George; Emily G Gean; Ayon Nandi; Boris Frolov; Eram Zaidi; Ho Lee; James R Brašić; Dean F Wong Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 5.749
Authors: Shawniqua T Williams; Mary M Conte; Andrew M Goldfine; Quentin Noirhomme; Olivia Gosseries; Marie Thonnard; Bradley Beattie; Jennifer Hersh; Douglas I Katz; Jonathan D Victor; Steven Laureys; Nicholas D Schiff Journal: Elife Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Min-Kyun Oh; Kyung Jae Yoon; Yong-Taek Lee; Seoung Wan Chae; Hye Young Choi; Hee Suk Shin; Yun Hee Park; Se-Woong Chun; Young Sook Park Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Aneta Kielar; Tiffany Deschamps; Ron K O Chu; Regina Jokel; Yasha B Khatamian; Jean J Chen; Jed A Meltzer Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.750