Literature DB >> 20486008

Ranking initial environmental and human health risk resulting from environmentally relevant nanomaterials.

Niall O'Brien1, Enda Cummins.   

Abstract

As nanomaterials find increased application in commercial and industrial products and processes so too the potential for release of these novel materials into the environment increases. The characteristics of these materials also may result in novel toxicological actions related to their nanoscale, which will have implications on their ecotoxicological and toxicological limits of exposure and eventual regulation. A framework for nanomaterial risk assessment on regulatory, ecotoxicological and toxicological bases developed from recent exposure and toxicity studies is presented. The release of nanoscale TiO(2), Ag and CeO(2) to the atmosphere and surface waters is assessed against provisional toxicological bench mark doses (BMDs) and critical effect doses (CEDs) developed from best available data. Predicted levels of nanomaterial release to surface waters and the atmosphere resulted in regulatory risk rankings of moderate concern based on worst case provisional regulatory limits. Inhalation and ingestion risk rankings were of very low concern based on the provisional inhalation and ingestion toxicity BMDLs and CEDLs determined for the nanomaterials in question. More toxicological data is needed on nanoscale CeO(2) inhalation to develop a true dose response as in vitro cytotoxicity studies yielded an inhalation risk ranking of lower concern. The moderate to high ecotoxicological risk rankings posed by the release of nanoscale TiO(2) and Ag to surface waters highlights the need for guidance and restriction on the usage and disposal of commercial products containing nanomaterial. The risk rankings presented in this assessment give a first indication of the relative risks posed by the usage and release of these materials into the environment and indicate what materials require further investigation into their nano-specific toxicological actions. As more nano-relevant toxicity studies are published, end-points and risk levels related to nano-specific toxicity actions may be determined and the provisional BMDLs developed as part of this framework refined, resulting in more confident risk rankings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20486008     DOI: 10.1080/10934521003772410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng        ISSN: 1093-4529            Impact factor:   2.269


  13 in total

1.  Effect of green tea powder (Camellia sinensis L. cv. Benifuuki) particle size on O-methylated EGCG absorption in rats; The Kakegawa Study.

Authors:  Mari Maeda-Yamamoto; Kaori Ema; Yoshiko Tokuda; Manami Monobe; Hirofumi Tachibana; Yoichi Sameshima; Shinichi Kuriyama
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Effects of particle size and coating on toxicologic parameters, fecal elimination kinetics and tissue distribution of acutely ingested silver nanoparticles in a mouse model.

Authors:  Ingrid L Bergin; Laura A Wilding; Masako Morishita; Kim Walacavage; Andrew P Ault; Jessica L Axson; Diana I Stark; Sara A Hashway; Sonja S Capracotta; Pascale R Leroueil; Andrew D Maynard; Martin A Philbert
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.913

3.  Analysis of metallic and metal oxide nanomaterial environmental emissions.

Authors:  Thabet Tolaymat; Amro El Badawy; Ash Genaidy; Wael Abdelraheem; Reynold Swqueria
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 9.297

4.  Silver nanoparticle toxicity in Drosophila: size does matter.

Authors:  Deborah J Gorth; David M Rand; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-02-11

5.  Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications - a review.

Authors:  Karna Ramachandraiah; Sung Gu Han; Koo Bok Chin
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  Needs and challenges for assessing the environmental impacts of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

Authors:  Michelle Romero-Franco; Hilary A Godwin; Muhammad Bilal; Yoram Cohen
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.649

7.  Health risks associated with the pharmaceuticals in wastewater.

Authors:  Nasser Nassiri Koopaei; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Effect of exposure to CeO2 nanoparticles on ram spermatozoa during storage at 4 °C for 96 hours.

Authors:  Laura Falchi; Grazia Galleri; Gian Mario Dore; Maria Teresa Zedda; Salvatore Pau; Luisa Bogliolo; Federica Ariu; Alessandra Pinna; Stefano Nieddu; Plinio Innocenzi; Sergio Ledda
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Evaluation of environmental safety concentrations of DMSA Coated Fe2O3-NPs using different assay systems in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Qiuli Wu; Yiping Li; Meng Tang; Dayong Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Decreased Phototoxic Effects of TiO₂ Nanoparticles in Consortium of Bacterial Isolates from Domestic Waste Water.

Authors:  Ankita Mathur; Jyoti Kumari; Abhinav Parashar; Lavanya T; N Chandrasekaran; Amitava Mukherjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.