INTRODUCTION: Lack of adherence to prescribed antipsychotic medication is recognized as a leading reason for poor outcomes and symptomatic relapse among patients with schizophrenia. There is evidence, however, that treating clinicians are often either unaware that their patients are not taking their medication or overestimate their adherence. METHODS: A structured instrument, the Medication Adherence Assessment Tool (MAAT), was developed by an expert group of clinicians convened and sponsored by Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Clinicians were asked to use the MAAT to rate the degree of adherence among a group of their patients who were prescribed antipsychotic medications. We compared the results of the MAAT evaluation with a validated, indirect measure of treatment adherence derived from pharmacy data, the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Although the MAAT has good internal reliability, we found that MAAT scores were not significantly correlated with MPR. Conclusion. These findings suggest that, even when using a structured instrument, clinicians are unable to accurately assess the degree of treatment adherence among patients prescribed antipsychotic medications. Informing clinicians as to measures of medication possession, such as the MPR, appears to be a low-cost, minimally intrusive, and effective way to improve clinician assessment of patient adherence and thereby overall clinical outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Lack of adherence to prescribed antipsychotic medication is recognized as a leading reason for poor outcomes and symptomatic relapse among patients with schizophrenia. There is evidence, however, that treating clinicians are often either unaware that their patients are not taking their medication or overestimate their adherence. METHODS: A structured instrument, the Medication Adherence Assessment Tool (MAAT), was developed by an expert group of clinicians convened and sponsored by Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Clinicians were asked to use the MAAT to rate the degree of adherence among a group of their patients who were prescribed antipsychotic medications. We compared the results of the MAAT evaluation with a validated, indirect measure of treatment adherence derived from pharmacy data, the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Although the MAAT has good internal reliability, we found that MAAT scores were not significantly correlated with MPR. Conclusion. These findings suggest that, even when using a structured instrument, clinicians are unable to accurately assess the degree of treatment adherence among patients prescribed antipsychotic medications. Informing clinicians as to measures of medication possession, such as the MPR, appears to be a low-cost, minimally intrusive, and effective way to improve clinician assessment of patient adherence and thereby overall clinical outcomes.
Authors: Fernando Cañas; Koksal Alptekin; Jean Michel Azorin; Vincent Dubois; Robin Emsley; Antonio G García; Philip Gorwood; Peter M Haddad; Dieter Naber; José M Olivares; Georgios Papageorgiou; Miquel Roca Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Shubhra Mace; Oscar Chak; Sharanjeet Punny; Daniel Sedough-Abbasian; Chirag Vegad; David M Taylor Journal: Ther Adv Psychopharmacol Date: 2019-07-03
Authors: Anne S Oberguggenberger; Monika Sztankay; Beate Beer; Birthe Schubert; Verena Meraner; Herbert Oberacher; Georg Kemmler; Johannes Giesinger; Eva Gamper; Barbara Sperner-Unterweger; Christian Marth; Bernhard Holzner; Michael Hubalek Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Eline C Jochems; Cornelis L Mulder; Arno van Dam; Hugo J Duivenvoorden; Sylvia C M Scheffer; Willem van der Spek; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 3.630