Literature DB >> 20484687

What season is it anyway? Circadian tracking vs. photoperiodic anticipation in insects.

William E Bradshaw1, Christina M Holzapfel.   

Abstract

The daily rhythm of 24 h and the annual rhythm of 12 mo constitute the 2 major, highly predictable rhythms of the biosphere. The internal circadian clock enables organisms to track daily changes in their environment; the photoperiodic timer, alone or in concert with a circannual clock, enables organisms to anticipate and prepare in advance for seasonal changes in their environment. The circadian clock entrains to dawn and dusk and tracks light and temperature on a day-to-day basis, while the photoperiodic timer serves as a long-term, physiological go/no-go switch that commits an animal to development, reproduction, dormancy, or migration on a seasonal or even lifetime basis. In 1936, Erwin Bünning proposed that circadian rhythms formed the basis (Grundlage) for photoperiodic response to day length. Historical inertia generated by correlative evidence from early physiological studies and a proliferating number of descriptive models has resulted in the widespread assumption that the circadian clock constitutes the necessary, causal basis of photoperiodism in general. This historical inertia has also restricted the search for genes involved in insect photoperiodism to genes central to the circadian clock in Drosophila and has led investigators to conclude that any behavior, process, or gene expression that varies with day length represents photoperiodism or a gene involved in photoperiodism. The authors discuss how blinders imposed by the circadian imperative have retarded progress toward identifying the genetic basis of photoperiodism and how the insights gained from geographic variation in photoperiodic response have been used to show the independent evolution of the circadian clock and photoperiodism. When geographic variation is found in circadian genes, the most immediate and parsimonious search for adaptive significance should be in circadian function, not in extrapolation to photoperiodism. Finally, the authors propose that circadian-unbiased, forward genetic approaches should be used to identify genes involved in photoperiodism within extant populations and among populations over evolutionary time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484687     DOI: 10.1177/0748730410365656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  24 in total

1.  Genetic correlations and the evolution of photoperiodic time measurement within a local population of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii.

Authors:  W E Bradshaw; K J Emerson; C M Holzapfel
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Testing for causality in covarying traits: genes and latitude in a molecular world.

Authors:  Conor O'Brien; William E Bradshaw; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Keeping time without a spine: what can the insect clock teach us about seasonal adaptation?

Authors:  David L Denlinger; Daniel A Hahn; Christine Merlin; Christina M Holzapfel; William E Bradshaw
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Artificial light at night decreases metamorphic duration and juvenile growth in a widespread amphibian.

Authors:  Kacey L Dananay; Michael F Benard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Footprints in time: comparative quantitative trait loci mapping of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Kevin J Emerson; Julian M Catchen; William A Cresko; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Circadian clock genes, ovarian development and diapause.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Autonomous regulation of the insect gut by circadian genes acting downstream of juvenile hormone signaling.

Authors:  Adam Bajgar; Marek Jindra; David Dolezel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Geography of the circadian gene clock and photoperiodic response in western North American populations of the three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  C O'Brien; L Unruh; C Zimmerman; W E Bradshaw; C M Holzapfel; W A Cresko
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.051

10.  Seasonal variation in the diel activity of a dung beetle assemblage.

Authors:  Jorge M Lobo; Eva Cuesta
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.