PURPOSE: As part of ongoing studies on proteomic alterations during glaucomatous neurodegeneration, this study focused on the complement system. METHODS: Human retinal protein samples obtained from donor eyes with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) glaucoma were analyzed by a quantitative proteomic approach using mass spectrometry. Cellular localization of protein expression for different complement components and regulators were also determined by immunohistochemical analysis of an additional group of human donor eyes with glaucoma (n = 34) compared with age-matched control eyes without glaucoma (n = 20). In addition, to determine the regulation of complement factor H (CFH) by oxidative stress, in vitro experiments were performed using rat retinal cell cultures incubated in the presence and absence of an oxidant treatment. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis detected the expression and differential regulation of several complement components in glaucomatous samples, which included proteins involved in the classical and the lectin pathways of complement activation. In addition, several complement regulatory proteins were detected in the human retinal proteome, and glaucomatous samples exhibited a trend toward downregulation of CFH expression. In vitro experiments revealed that oxidative stress, which was also prominently detectable in the glaucomatous human retinas, downregulated CFH expression in retinal cells. CONCLUSIONS: These findings expand the current knowledge of complement activation by presenting new evidence in human glaucoma and support that despite important roles in tissue cleaning and healing, a potential deficiency in intrinsic regulation of complement activation, as is evident in the presence of oxidative stress, may lead to uncontrolled complement attack with neurodestructive consequences.
PURPOSE: As part of ongoing studies on proteomic alterations during glaucomatous neurodegeneration, this study focused on the complement system. METHODS:Human retinal protein samples obtained from donor eyes with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) glaucoma were analyzed by a quantitative proteomic approach using mass spectrometry. Cellular localization of protein expression for different complement components and regulators were also determined by immunohistochemical analysis of an additional group of humandonor eyes with glaucoma (n = 34) compared with age-matched control eyes without glaucoma (n = 20). In addition, to determine the regulation of complement factor H (CFH) by oxidative stress, in vitro experiments were performed using rat retinal cell cultures incubated in the presence and absence of an oxidant treatment. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis detected the expression and differential regulation of several complement components in glaucomatous samples, which included proteins involved in the classical and the lectin pathways of complement activation. In addition, several complement regulatory proteins were detected in the human retinal proteome, and glaucomatous samples exhibited a trend toward downregulation of CFH expression. In vitro experiments revealed that oxidative stress, which was also prominently detectable in the glaucomatoushuman retinas, downregulated CFH expression in retinal cells. CONCLUSIONS: These findings expand the current knowledge of complement activation by presenting new evidence in humanglaucoma and support that despite important roles in tissue cleaning and healing, a potential deficiency in intrinsic regulation of complement activation, as is evident in the presence of oxidative stress, may lead to uncontrolled complement attack with neurodestructive consequences.
Authors: Robert J Klein; Caroline Zeiss; Emily Y Chew; Jen-Yue Tsai; Richard S Sackler; Chad Haynes; Alice K Henning; John Paul SanGiovanni; Shrikant M Mane; Susan T Mayne; Michael B Bracken; Frederick L Ferris; Jurg Ott; Colin Barnstable; Josephine Hoh Journal: Science Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael R Steele; Denise M Inman; David J Calkins; Philip J Horner; Monica L Vetter Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jonathan L Haines; Michael A Hauser; Silke Schmidt; William K Scott; Lana M Olson; Paul Gallins; Kylee L Spencer; Shu Ying Kwan; Maher Noureddine; John R Gilbert; Nathalie Schnetz-Boutaud; Anita Agarwal; Eric A Postel; Margaret A Pericak-Vance Journal: Science Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gregory S Hageman; Don H Anderson; Lincoln V Johnson; Lisa S Hancox; Andrew J Taiber; Lisa I Hardisty; Jill L Hageman; Heather A Stockman; James D Borchardt; Karen M Gehrs; Richard J H Smith; Giuliana Silvestri; Stephen R Russell; Caroline C W Klaver; Irene Barbazetto; Stanley Chang; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Gaetano R Barile; John C Merriam; R Theodore Smith; Adam K Olsh; Julie Bergeron; Jana Zernant; Joanna E Merriam; Bert Gold; Michael Dean; Rando Allikmets Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-05-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ronan S Rogers; Moyez Dharsee; Suzanne Ackloo; Jeremy M Sivak; John G Flanagan Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Alejandra Bosco; Sarah R Anderson; Kevin T Breen; Cesar O Romero; Michael R Steele; Vince A Chiodo; Sanford L Boye; William W Hauswirth; Stephen Tomlinson; Monica L Vetter Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 11.454