BACKGROUND:Calcium is an essential cotherapy in osteoporosis treatment. The relative effectiveness of various calcium salts for this purpose is uncertain. Many older women with osteoporosis have phosphorus intakes of <70% of the Recommended Dietary Allowance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that calcium phosphate would better support anabolic bone building than would calcium carbonate. DESIGN: This study was a 12-mo, randomized, positive-comparator, 2-arm, single-blind clinical trial in 211 patients treated withteriparatide who consumed <1000 mg phosphorus/d. Participants were randomly assigned to receive, in addition to teriparatide and 1000 IU cholecalciferol, 1800 mg calcium/d as either tricalcium phosphate or calcium carbonate. The primary endpoints were changes in lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral densities (BMDs); secondary endpoints were changes in bone resorption biomarkers and serum and urine calcium and phosphorus concentrations. RESULTS: In the combined group, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 7.2%, and total hip BMD increased by 2.1% (P < 0.01 for both). However, there was no significant difference between calcium-treatment groups, and there were no significant between-group differences in serum calcium and phosphorus concentrations or in urine calcium concentrations. Bone resorption biomarkers increased in both groups, as expected with teriparatide, but the increases in the 2 calcium groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS:Tricalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate appear to be approximately equally effective in supporting bone building with a potent anabolic agent; phosphate salt may be preferable in patients with restricted phosphorus intakes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00074711.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Calcium is an essential cotherapy in osteoporosis treatment. The relative effectiveness of various calcium salts for this purpose is uncertain. Many older women with osteoporosis have phosphorus intakes of <70% of the Recommended Dietary Allowance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis that calcium phosphate would better support anabolic bone building than would calcium carbonate. DESIGN: This study was a 12-mo, randomized, positive-comparator, 2-arm, single-blind clinical trial in 211 patients treated with teriparatide who consumed <1000 mg phosphorus/d. Participants were randomly assigned to receive, in addition to teriparatide and 1000 IU cholecalciferol, 1800 mg calcium/d as either tricalcium phosphate or calcium carbonate. The primary endpoints were changes in lumbar spine and total hip bone mineral densities (BMDs); secondary endpoints were changes in bone resorption biomarkers and serum and urine calcium and phosphorus concentrations. RESULTS: In the combined group, the lumbar spine BMD increased by 7.2%, and total hip BMD increased by 2.1% (P < 0.01 for both). However, there was no significant difference between calcium-treatment groups, and there were no significant between-group differences in serum calcium and phosphorus concentrations or in urine calcium concentrations. Bone resorption biomarkers increased in both groups, as expected with teriparatide, but the increases in the 2 calcium groups did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS:Tricalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate appear to be approximately equally effective in supporting bone building with a potent anabolic agent; phosphate salt may be preferable in patients with restricted phosphorus intakes. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00074711.
Authors: R M Neer; C D Arnaud; J R Zanchetta; R Prince; G A Gaich; J Y Reginster; A B Hodsman; E F Eriksen; S Ish-Shalom; H K Genant; O Wang; B H Mitlak Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M C Chapuy; M E Arlot; F Duboeuf; J Brun; B Crouzet; S Arnaud; P D Delmas; P J Meunier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-12-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jae-Suk Choi; Hyun-Soo Shin; Ki Young Kim; Sae Kwang Ku; In Soon Choi; Joo Wan Kim Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: R Rizzoli; E Biver; J-P Bonjour; V Coxam; D Goltzman; J A Kanis; J Lappe; L Rejnmark; S Sahni; C Weaver; H Weiler; J-Y Reginster Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jae-Suk Choi; Joo Wan Kim; Ki Young Kim; Hyung-Rae Cho; In Soon Choi; Sae Kwang Ku Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 2.447