Literature DB >> 20484210

Combination therapy for the management of hypertension: A review of the evidence.

Nitesh Sood1, Kurt M Reinhart, William L Baker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evidence regarding combination therapy for the management of hypertension is reviewed.
SUMMARY: Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated the importance of early aggressive lowering of blood pressure, especially in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, one of the difficulties with achieving these blood pressure goals quickly is that monotherapy is often insufficient. Many large randomized trials have shown that two or more antihypertensive agents are required for patients to reach their treatment goals. Recent data have suggested that the use of combination therapy in patients with hypertension may be beneficial in terms of improving blood-pressure-lowering efficacy, obtaining blood pressure goals earlier, and reducing major adverse cardiovascular events. Studies have found that therapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) combined with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor significantly reduces both blood pressure and major clinical events compared with an ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination. Combination ACE inhibitor-CCB therapy has also demonstrated superior blood-pressure-lowering efficacy and safety compared with either group used as monotherapy, including lower rates of peripheral edema compared with those achieved with increased doses of CCBs. The combination of an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin II-receptor blocker has not been found to be superior to either group as monotherapy in patients with hypertension and should not be recommended at this time.
CONCLUSION: Combination drug therapy for the treatment of hypertension is supported by numerous randomized trials and clinical management guidelines. The addition of a diuretic or CCB to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system blocker therapy may provide an effective combination for reducing blood pressure and cardiovascular events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484210     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  10 in total

Review 1.  First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Javier Garjón; Luis Carlos Saiz; Ana Azparren; José J Elizondo; Idoia Gaminde; Mª José Ariz; Juan Erviti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-13

2.  Discovery of Selective Small Molecule ROMK Inhibitors as Potential New Mechanism Diuretics.

Authors:  Haifeng Tang; Shawn P Walsh; Yan Yan; Reynalda K de Jesus; Aurash Shahripour; Nardos Teumelsan; Yuping Zhu; Sookhee Ha; Karen A Owens; Brande S Thomas-Fowlkes; John P Felix; Jessica Liu; Martin Kohler; Birgit T Priest; Timothy Bailey; Richard Brochu; Magdalena Alonso-Galicia; Gregory J Kaczorowski; Sophie Roy; Lihu Yang; Sander G Mills; Maria L Garcia; Alexander Pasternak
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Prescription diuretic use and risk of basal cell carcinoma in the nationwide U.S. radiologic technologists cohort.

Authors:  Emily McDonald; D Michal Freedman; Bruce H Alexander; Michele M Doody; Margaret A Tucker; Martha S Linet; Elizabeth K Cahoon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Comparison of long-term safety of fixed-dose combinations azilsartan medoxomil/chlorthalidone vs olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; William C Cushman; Eric Lloyd; Bruce Barger; Alison Handley
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Polypharmacy in Older Adults With Hypertension: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bertrand N Mukete; Keith C Ferdinand
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.

Authors:  Javier Garjón; Luis Carlos Saiz; Ana Azparren; Idoia Gaminde; Mª José Ariz; Juan Erviti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-06

7.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of azilsartan medoxomil with or without chlorthalidone during and after 8 months of treatment for hypertension.

Authors:  Mark S Kipnes; Alison Handley; Eric Lloyd; Bruce Barger; Andrew Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  A review of the efficacy and tolerability of combination amlodipine/valsartan in non-white patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Keith C Ferdinand; Samar A Nasser
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.571

9.  Safety and tolerability of azilsartan medoxomil in subjects with essential hypertension: a one-year, phase 3, open-label study.

Authors:  Alison Handley; Eric Lloyd; Andrew Roberts; Bruce Barger
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.749

Review 10.  Combining angiotensin receptor blockers with chlorthalidone or hydrochlorothiazide - which is the better alternative? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elena Filipova; Stela Dineva; Katya Uzunova; Velichka Pavlova; Krassimir Kalinov; Toni Vekov
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.