Literature DB >> 20483854

Power increases hypocrisy: moralizing in reasoning, immorality in behavior.

Joris Lammers1, Diederik A Stapel, Adam D Galinsky.   

Abstract

In five studies, we explored whether power increases moral hypocrisy (i.e., imposing strict moral standards on other people but practicing less strict moral behavior oneself). In Experiment 1, compared with the powerless, the powerful condemned other people's cheating more, but also cheated more themselves. In Experiments 2 through 4, the powerful were more strict in judging other people's moral transgressions than in judging their own transgressions. A final study found that the effect of power on moral hypocrisy depends on the legitimacy of the power: When power was illegitimate, the moral-hypocrisy effect was reversed, with the illegitimately powerful becoming stricter in judging their own behavior than in judging other people's behavior. This pattern, which might be dubbed hypercrisy, was also found among low-power participants in Experiments 3 and 4. We discuss how patterns of hypocrisy and hypercrisy among the powerful and powerless can help perpetuate social inequality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20483854     DOI: 10.1177/0956797610368810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  14 in total

1.  Apostolic faith church organization contexts for health and wellbeing in women and children.

Authors:  Elias Mpofu; Tinashe Moira Dune; Denise Dion Hallfors; John Mapfumo; Magen Mhaka Mutepfa; James January
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Power decreases trust in social exchange.

Authors:  Oliver Schilke; Martin Reimann; Karen S Cook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

5.  Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: to be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor?

Authors:  Wei Xiao; Qing Wu; Qun Yang; Liang Zhou; Yuan Jiang; Jiaxi Zhang; Danmin Miao; Jiaxi Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolving righteousness in a corrupt world.

Authors:  Edgar A Duéñez-Guzmán; Suzanne Sadedin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cerebral lateralization of pro- and anti-social tendencies.

Authors:  David Hecht
Journal:  Exp Neurobiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.261

8.  Caring Cooperators and Powerful Punishers: Differential Effects of Induced Care and Power Motivation on Different Types of Economic Decision Making.

Authors:  G Chierchia; F H Parianen Lesemann; D Snower; M Vogel; T Singer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Power Corrupts, but Control Does Not: What Stands Behind the Effects of Holding High Positions.

Authors:  Aleksandra Cislak; Aleksandra Cichocka; Adrian Dominik Wojcik; Natalia Frankowska
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-02-27

10.  Closing the gender gap in competitiveness through priming.

Authors:  Loukas Balafoutas; Helena Fornwagner; Matthias Sutter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.