Literature DB >> 20483571

Machine learning of clinical performance in a pancreatic cancer database.

John Hayward1, Sergio A Alvarez, Carolina Ruiz, Mary Sullivan, Jennifer Tseng, Giles Whalen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We consider predictive models for clinical performance of pancreatic cancer patients based on machine learning techniques. The predictive performance of machine learning is compared with that of the linear and logistic regression techniques that dominate the medical oncology literature. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We construct predictive models over a clinical database that we have developed for the University of Massachusetts Memorial Hospital in Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. The database contains retrospective records of 91 patient treatments for pancreatic tumors. Classification and regression targets include patient survival time, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) quality of life scores, surgical outcomes, and tumor characteristics. The predictive performance of several techniques is described, and specific models are presented.
RESULTS: We show that machine learning techniques attain a predictive performance that is as good as, or better than, that of linear and logistic regression, for target attributes that include tumor N and T stage, survival time, and ECOG quality of life scores. Bayesian techniques are found to provide the best performance overall. For tumor size as the target attribute, however, logistic regression (respectively linear regression in the case of a numerical as opposed to discrete target) performs best. Preprocessing in the form of attribute selection and supervised attribute discretization improves predictive performance for most of the predictive techniques and target attributes considered.
CONCLUSION: Machine learning provides techniques for improved prediction of clinical performance. These techniques therefore merit consideration as valuable alternatives to traditional multivariate regression techniques in clinical medical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20483571     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2010.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  6 in total

1.  Effects of pooling samples on the performance of classification algorithms: a comparative study.

Authors:  Kanthida Kusonmano; Michael Netzer; Christian Baumgartner; Matthias Dehmer; Klaus R Liedl; Armin Graber
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-30

2.  Comparing Three Data Mining Methods to Predict Kidney Transplant Survival.

Authors:  Leila Shahmoradi; Mostafa Langarizadeh; Gholamreza Pourmand; Ziba Aghsaei Fard; Alireza Borhani
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-11-01

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for the management of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Myrte Gorris; Sanne A Hoogenboom; Michael B Wallace; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 4.  Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Ruibiao Fu; Qian Shao; Yan Chen; Qinghuang Ye; Sheng Li; Xiongxiong He; Jinhui Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Decision support methods for finding phenotype--disorder associations in the bone dysplasia domain.

Authors:  Razan Paul; Tudor Groza; Jane Hunter; Andreas Zankl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Use of Machine-Learning Algorithms in Intensified Preoperative Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer to Predict Individual Risk of Relapse.

Authors:  Pablo Sala Elarre; Esther Oyaga-Iriarte; Kenneth H Yu; Vicky Baudin; Leire Arbea Moreno; Omar Carranza; Ana Chopitea Ortega; Mariano Ponz-Sarvise; Luis D Mejías Sosa; Fernando Rotellar Sastre; Blanca Larrea Leoz; Yohana Iragorri Barberena; Jose C Subtil Iñigo; Alberto Benito Boíllos; Fernando Pardo; Javier Rodríguez Rodríguez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.