Literature DB >> 20483172

Can delusions be self-assessed? Concordance between self- and observer-rated delusions in schizophrenia.

Tania Marie Lincoln1, Michael Ziegler, Eva Lüllmann, Matthias J Müller, Winfried Rief.   

Abstract

Several multi-dimensional self-report scales have been developed to assess delusional ideation in the general population. However, self-ratings of positive symptoms in patients with psychosis are often considered unreliable due to neuro-cognitive disturbance and lack of insight. This study tested associations of self- and observer-rated delusions as well as factors associated with discrepancies. Observer-rated delusions were assessed in 80 in- and outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders by trained raters with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Self-rated delusions were assessed with the Peters et al. Delusions Inventory and the Paranoia Checklist. Correlations between self- and observer-rated overall delusions ranged from 0.49 to 0.57. Associations between specific delusions of persecution and grandiosity were moderate but unique. Good concordance of ratings was not restricted to outpatients or patients with fewer positive symptoms. Patients with lower self- than observer ratings of delusions were characterised by fewer years of education, lower functioning, more negative symptoms and less insight. The results indicate that patients can reliably provide information with regard to the presence and type of delusional beliefs. Thus, patient ratings are a valid additional source of diagnostic information. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20483172     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  18 in total

1.  Jumping to Conclusions About the Beads Task? A Meta-analysis of Delusional Ideation and Data-Gathering.

Authors:  Robert Malcolm Ross; Ryan McKay; Max Coltheart; Robyn Langdon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Screening for negative symptoms: preliminary results from the self-report version of the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms.

Authors:  Stephanie G Park; Katiah Llerena; Julie M McCarthy; Shannon M Couture; Melanie E Bennett; Jack J Blanchard
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management.

Authors:  Mario Maj; Jim van Os; Marc De Hert; Wolfgang Gaebel; Silvana Galderisi; Michael F Green; Sinan Guloksuz; Philip D Harvey; Peter B Jones; Dolores Malaspina; Patrick McGorry; Jouko Miettunen; Robin M Murray; Keith H Nuechterlein; Victor Peralta; Graham Thornicroft; Ruud van Winkel; Joseph Ventura
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Comparison of self-report and clinician-rated schizotypal traits in schizotypal personality disorder and community controls.

Authors:  Chi C Chan; Andrea Bulbena-Cabre; Sarah Rutter; Caridad Benavides; Margaret M McClure; William Calabrese; Daniel R Rosell; Harold W Koenigsberg; Marianne Goodman; Antonia S New; Erin A Hazlett; M Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Assessing anomalous perceptual experiences in nonpsychiatric individuals and outpatients with psychosis in Taiwan: an investigation using the cardiff anomalous perceptions scale (CAPS).

Authors:  Yu-Chen Kao; Tzong-Shi Wang; Chien-Wen Lu; Yia-Ping Liu
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2013-06

6.  The Relevance of Emotion Regulation in Explaining Why Social Exclusion Triggers Paranoia in Individuals at Clinical High Risk of Psychosis.

Authors:  Tania M Lincoln; Johanna Sundag; Björn Schlier; Anne Karow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Letter to the editor: Critique of Bahorik et al. (2013)--'Under-reporting of drug use among individuals with schizophrenia: prevalence and predictors'.

Authors:  Richard A Van Dorn; Sarah L Desmarais; Marvin S Swartz; M Scott Young; Brian G Sellers
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Embracing Psychosis: A Cognitive Insight Intervention Improves Personal Narratives and Meaning-Making in Patients With Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steffen Moritz; Candelaria I Mahlke; Stefan Westermann; Friederike Ruppelt; Paul H Lysaker; Thomas Bock; Christina Andreou
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Psychotic Experiences and Related Distress: A Cross-national Comparison and Network Analysis Based on 7141 Participants From 13 Countries.

Authors:  Caroline Wüsten; Björn Schlier; Edo S Jaya; Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Emmanuelle Peters; Hélène Verdoux; Todd S Woodward; Tim B Ziermans; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Jumping to conclusions is associated with paranoia but not general suspiciousness: a comparison of two versions of the probabilistic reasoning paradigm.

Authors:  Steffen Moritz; Niels Van Quaquebeke; Tania M Lincoln
Journal:  Schizophr Res Treatment       Date:  2012-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.