Literature DB >> 20480255

HPB surgery can be safely performed in a community teaching hospital.

Andrei Cocieru1, Pierre F Saldinger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is ongoing debate about feasibility of performing hepatobiliopancreatic (HPB) cases in low-volume, community hospitals. We decided to analyze outcomes of HPB surgical cases done in our community hospital and compare it with published data from academic centers and/or national data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed all HPB cases (liver, pancreas, and bile duct cases) performed in an 8-year-period (2001-2009) by HPB-fellowship-trained general surgeon (P.F.S.) at the Danbury Hospital, CT, USA. All electronic files of the patients, who underwent HPB surgery, were reviewed, and all pertinent clinical information was retrieved. Complications and mortality were recorded for length of hospital stay and 30 days after discharge. All complications were graded according to Clavien classification. Pancreatic specific complications--pancreatic fistula/leak and delayed gastric emptying--were graded using International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula and International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definitions.
RESULTS: There were 140 HPB cases. These included 33 pancreatoduodenectomies, 29 distal pancreatectomies, 52 hepatic cases, and 26 cases of other cases involving pancreas and biliary tract. Overall complication rate was 36.4%. Using Clavien classifications, there were 26 grade 1 complications, 21 grade 2 complications, and four grade 3 complications. Two patients underwent reoperation for postoperative complications. Overall mortality was 0.7% (one patient). Pancreas-specific complications included 6% pancreatic leak rate after pancreatoduodenectomy and 24.1% leak rate for distal pancreatectomy.
CONCLUSION: HPB surgery could be safely performed in community setting, with morbidity and mortality comparable to high-volume centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480255     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1215-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  15 in total

1.  Relationship between hospital volume, system clinical resources, and mortality in pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Bellal Joseph; John M Morton; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Ilan Rubinfeld; Chadi Faraj; Vic Velanovich
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Surgical specialization and operative mortality in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Jessica P Simons; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Courtney R Goodwin; Akhil K Seth; Barish H Edil; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; Bridget N Fahy; Craig P Fischer; Stephen L Jones; Andrea Duchini; Joseph Galati; A Osama Gaber; R Mark Ghobrial; Barbara L Bass
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship.

Authors:  Hari Nathan; John L Cameron; Michael A Choti; Richard D Schulick; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Does it matter what a hospital is "high volume" for? Specificity of hospital volume-outcome associations for surgical procedures: analysis of administrative data.

Authors:  David R Urbach; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-12

8.  Surgical outcomes following pancreatic resection at a low-volume community hospital: do all patients need to be sent to a regional cancer center?

Authors:  John David Cunningham; Nancy O'Donnell; Paul Starker
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Major HPB procedures must be undertaken in high volume quaternary centres?

Authors:  A N Kingsnorth
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2000

10.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system.

Authors:  Micheal T Schell; Anthony Barcia; Austin L Spitzer; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2008
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The volume effect in liver surgery--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Richardson; Tony C Y Pang; Emma Johnston; Michael J Hollands; Vincent W T Lam; Henry C C Pleass
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Starting a High-Quality Pancreatic Surgery Program at a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hardacre; Siavash Raigani; John Dumot
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A cohort study on the risk of hepatectomy and pancreatectomy after history of abdominal surgery on other organs.

Authors:  Atsushi Nanashima; Masahide Hiyoshi; Naoya Imamura; Koichi Yano; Takeomi Hamada; Takashi Wada; Takahiro Nishida; Kazuyo Tsuchiya; Fumiaki Kawano; Takuto Ikeda; Shinsuke Takeno
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-11-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.