Literature DB >> 20480212

Influence of ground cover management on diversity and density of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Guadeloupean citrus orchards.

Julie Mailloux1, Fabrice Le Bellec, Serge Kreiter, Marie-Stéphane Tixier, Pauline Dubois.   

Abstract

The abundance and diversity of phytoseiid mites in the vegetal ground cover of a citrus orchard were surveyed by monthly samplings from October 2008 to July 2009. Six different vegetal cover management methods were studied: herbicide application without mowing (Gly), mowing without herbicide application (PV), mowing with herbicide application (AV), late mowing without herbicide application (LMV), cover crop (Neonotonia wightii, Fabaceae) without herbicide application (PNeo) and cover crop with herbicide application (ANeo). Eleven species were present in the ground cover, with Phytoseius rex and Proprioseiopsis mexicanus as major species. Species richness and densities (1.5 ± 4.5) in the Gly treatment were very low, except for one sample 4 months after herbicide treatment. The AV and PV treatments showed poor diversity and very low mite densities (1.2 ± 2.6 and 1.4 ± 1.5, respectively). The LMV treatment showed the highest diversity and high density of phytoseiid mites (6.9 ± 8.8). The ANeo and PNeo treatments also showed generally high diversity, but with variations in time and exhibited the highest density of phytoseiid mites (13.5 ± 12.7 and 13.4 ± 9.1, respectively). Neonotonia wightii as the cover crop seems to act as a reservoir of phytoseiid mites, sustaining abundant and diverse populations all year round. Some naturally occurring plant species such as Achyranthes aspera, Amaranthus dubius and Eleutheranthera ruderalis could also constitute favourable host plants for Phytoseiidae. Results are discussed in relation to the potential of collected phytoseiid species as candidates for biological control of phytophagous mites on Guadeloupean citrus orchards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480212     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-010-9367-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  5 in total

Review 1.  Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture.

Authors:  D A Landis; S D Wratten; G M Gurr
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Life-styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control.

Authors:  J A McMurtry; B A Croft
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Immigration of phytoseiid mites from surrounding uncultivated areas into a newly planted vineyard.

Authors:  Marie-Stéphane Tixier; Serge Kreiter; Brigitte Cheval; Sabine Guichou; Philippe Auger; Romain Bonafos
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Volatile allelochemicals in the Ageratum conyzoides intercropped citrus orchard and their effects on mites Amblyseius newsami and Panonychus citri.

Authors:  Chuihua Kong; Fei Hu; Xiaohua Xu; Maoxin Zhang; Wenju Liang
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Impact of glyphosate on the development, fertility and demography of Chrysoperla externa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): ecological approach.

Authors:  M I Schneider; N Sanchez; S Pineda; H Chi; A Ronco
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.086

  5 in total
  8 in total

1.  Phytoseiids in Washington commercial apple orchards: biodiversity and factors affecting abundance.

Authors:  Rebecca A Schmidt-Jeffris; Elizabeth H Beers; David W Crowder
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Weed management practices affect the diversity and relative abundance of physic nut mites.

Authors:  Althiéris de Sousa Saraiva; Renato A Sarmento; Eduardo A L Erasmo; Marçal Pedro-Neto; Danival José de Souza; Adenir V Teodoro; Daniella G Silva
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Population survey of phytoseiid mites and spider mites on peach leaves and wild plants in Japanese peach orchard.

Authors:  David Wari; Jun Yamashita; Yoko Kataoka; Yoko Kohara; Norihide Hinomoto; Hidenari Kishimoto; Shingo Toyoshima; Shoji Sonoda
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Agroforestry management and phytoseiid communities in vineyards in the South of France.

Authors:  Marialivia Liguori; Marie-Stéphane Tixier; Akashi Fabio Hernandes; Martial Douin; Serge Kreiter
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Potential of the predatory mite Phytoseius finitimus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) to feed and reproduce on greenhouse pests.

Authors:  Maria L Pappas; Christos Xanthis; Konstantinos Samaras; Dimitris S Koveos; George D Broufas
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Efficacy of indigenous predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) against the citrus rust mite Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Acari: Eriophyidae): augmentation and conservation biological control in Israeli citrus orchards.

Authors:  Yonatan Maoz; Shira Gal; Yael Argov; Sylvie Domeratzky; Eti Melamed; Samuel Gan-Mor; Moshe Coll; Eric Palevsky
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Effect of Weed Management on the Parasitoid Community in Mediterranean Vineyards.

Authors:  Möller Gabriella; Keasar Tamar; Shapira Idan; Möller Daniella; Ferrante Marco; Segoli Michal
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24

8.  Testing the enemies hypothesis in peach orchards in two different geographic areas in eastern China: the role of ground cover vegetation.

Authors:  Nian-Feng Wan; Xiang-Yun Ji; Jie-Xian Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.