Literature DB >> 20480200

Feasibility study of oral cyclophosphamide salvage therapy for the treatment of heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Yoh Watanabe1, Tomomaro Etoh, Eiji Koike, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Wei-Min Wang, Hiroshi Hoshiai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, the objectives of salvage therapy are considered to be maintenance of quality of life and prolongation of patient survival. Chemotherapy using oral agents could be a good choice for salvage therapy. We reassessed the usefulness of oral cyclophosphamide (CPA) salvage therapy for heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: We evaluated the effects and toxicities of 100 mg oral dose (50 mg twice a day) of CPA for 14 patients who had undergone an average of 3 chemotherapy treatments before enrolling in our study.
RESULTS: One patient showed partial response and 8 developed stable diseases. Median time to progression was 3 months (range 1-13 months) and median survival was 7 months (range 2-28 months). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3/4 adverse effects were leukopenia (7.1%), neutropenia (14.3%), thrombocytopenia (7.1%), and nausea/vomiting (21.4%).
CONCLUSION: Although moderate gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, oral CPA therapy contributed to improving the survival of heavily pretreated patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. A well-designed phase II trial in this regard is awaited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20480200     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-010-0094-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin versus paclitaxel and carboplatin in platinum-sensitive recurrent advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GEICO (Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Cancer de Ovario) study.

Authors:  A J González-Martín; E Calvo; I Bover; M J Rubio; A Arcusa; A Casado; B Ojeda; C Balañá; E Martínez; A Herrero; B Pardo; E Adrover; J Rifá; M J Godes; A Moyano; A Cervantes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Meta-analysis of chemotherapy regimens for ovarian carcinoma: a reassessment of cisplatin, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin versus cisplatin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  R J West; S F Zweig
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.196

4.  Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results.

Authors:  M J Piccart; K Bertelsen; K James; J Cassidy; C Mangioni; E Simonsen; G Stuart; S Kaye; I Vergote; R Blom; R Grimshaw; R J Atkinson; K D Swenerton; C Trope; M Nardi; J Kaern; S Tumolo; P Timmers; J A Roy; F Lhoas; B Lindvall; M Bacon; A Birt; J E Andersen; B Zee; J Paul; B Baron; S Pecorelli
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan.

Authors:  A N Gordon; J T Fleagle; D Guthrie; D E Parkin; M E Gore; A J Lacave
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase II study of prolonged oral etoposide in patients with ovarian cancer refractory to or relapsing within 12 months after platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Authors:  R de Wit; M E van der Burg; A van den Gaast; A Logmans; G Stoter; J Verweij
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Phase II study of single-agent gemcitabine in heavily pretreated Japanese patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yoh Watanabe; Eiji Koike; Hidekatsu Nakai; Tomomaro Etoh; Hiroshi Hoshiai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Nonplatinum topotecan combinations versus topotecan alone for recurrent ovarian cancer: results of a phase III study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Jalid Sehouli; Dirk Stengel; Guelten Oskay-Oezcelik; Alain G Zeimet; Harald Sommer; Peter Klare; Martina Stauch; Axel Paulenz; Oumar Camara; Elke Keil; Werner Lichtenegger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Authors:  David G Mutch; Mauro Orlando; Tiana Goss; Michael G Teneriello; Alan N Gordon; Scott D McMeekin; Yanping Wang; Dennis R Scribner; Martin Marciniack; R Wendel Naumann; Angeles Alvarez Secord
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Protracted oral etoposide in epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study in patients with relapsed or platinum-resistant disease.

Authors:  M T Seymour; J L Mansi; C J Gallagher; M E Gore; P G Harper; T R Evans; P M Edmonds; M L Slevin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent ovarian cancer: when and how to treat.

Authors:  Marcia Hall; Gordon Rustin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Randomized trial of oral cyclophosphamide versus oral cyclophosphamide with celecoxib for recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Rohan Gupta; Mihaela Cristea; Paul Frankel; Christopher Ruel; Chen Chen; Yingyu Wang; Robert Morgan; Lucille Leong; Warren Chow; Marianna Koczywas; Steve Koehler; Dean Lim; Thehang Luu; Cynthia Martel; Mark McNamara; George Somlo; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Yun Yen; Amanam Idorenyi; Tinsley Raechelle; Mary Carroll; Vincent Chung
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 3.  Systemic treatment-induced gastrointestinal toxicity: incidence, clinical presentation and management.

Authors:  Stergios Boussios; George Pentheroudakis; Konstantinos Katsanos; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2012

4.  Metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (MOC) in the salvage therapy of heavily treated recurrent ovarian cancer patients: a retrospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Gabriella Ferrandina; Giacomo Corrado; Floriana Mascilini; Paola Malaguti; Riccardo Samaritani; Mariagrazia Distefano; Valeria Masciullo; Alessia Di Legge; Antonella Savarese; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  REDD1 is a determinant of low-dose metronomic doxorubicin-elicited endothelial cell dysfunction through downregulation of VEGFR-2/3 expression.

Authors:  Minsik Park; Joohwan Kim; Taesam Kim; Suji Kim; Wonjin Park; Kwon-Soo Ha; Sung Hwan Cho; Moo-Ho Won; Jeong-Hyung Lee; Young-Guen Kwon; Young-Myeong Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 8.718

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.