PURPOSE: In Total Therapy 2, after randomly assigning 323 patients with myeloma tothalidomide and 345 to a control arm, no difference was observed in overall survival, with a median follow-up of 42 months, although at 72 months, survival was superior on the thalidomide arm in the one third exhibiting cytogenetic abnormalities (CA). After further follow-up of 87 months, we examined, in reiterative analyses, the effect of increasing time intervals on clinical outcomes relevant to baseline prognostic variables and treatment randomization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated clinical trial end points as a function of increasing time intervals from protocol enrollment to determine consistencies of results by treatment and prognostic variables. RESULTS: The complete congruence of serial survival plots for both study arms combined attested to stable patient characteristics over the time of accrual and the quality of follow-up management. Presence of CA was associated with consistently inferior survival curves from year 3 onward. Although 80% of patients randomly assigned to thalidomide discontinued study drug after 2 years because of toxicity, its clinical benefit did not reach statistical significance until year 10. The relative ranking order in multivariate models of prognostic factors remained stable over time. Decline in initially high hazard ratio values of gene array-defined high risk is consistent with an initial crisis phase that is time limited. CONCLUSION: Reporting potentially time-sensitive features as a part of clinical trial results will enable the critical reader to judge the robustness of prognostic factors and the time sensitivity of outcome predictors, with important implications for future trial designs.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: In Total Therapy 2, after randomly assigning 323 patients with myeloma to thalidomide and 345 to a control arm, no difference was observed in overall survival, with a median follow-up of 42 months, although at 72 months, survival was superior on the thalidomide arm in the one third exhibiting cytogenetic abnormalities (CA). After further follow-up of 87 months, we examined, in reiterative analyses, the effect of increasing time intervals on clinical outcomes relevant to baseline prognostic variables and treatment randomization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated clinical trial end points as a function of increasing time intervals from protocol enrollment to determine consistencies of results by treatment and prognostic variables. RESULTS: The complete congruence of serial survival plots for both study arms combined attested to stable patient characteristics over the time of accrual and the quality of follow-up management. Presence of CA was associated with consistently inferior survival curves from year 3 onward. Although 80% of patients randomly assigned to thalidomide discontinued study drug after 2 years because of toxicity, its clinical benefit did not reach statistical significance until year 10. The relative ranking order in multivariate models of prognostic factors remained stable over time. Decline in initially high hazard ratio values of gene array-defined high risk is consistent with an initial crisis phase that is time limited. CONCLUSION: Reporting potentially time-sensitive features as a part of clinical trial results will enable the critical reader to judge the robustness of prognostic factors and the time sensitivity of outcome predictors, with important implications for future trial designs.
Authors: A Abdelkefi; L Torjman; N Ben Romdhane; S Ladeb; H El Omri; T Ben Othman; M Elloumi; H Bellaj; A Lakhal; R Jeddi; L Aissaouï; A Saad; M Hsaïri; K Boukef; K Dellagi; A Ben Abdeladhim Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Robert L Schlossman; Edie Weller; Teru Hideshima; Constantine Mitsiades; Faith Davies; Richard LeBlanc; Laurence P Catley; Deborah Doss; Kathleen Kelly; Mary McKenney; Julie Mechlowicz; Andrea Freeman; Reggie Deocampo; Rebecca Rich; Joan J Ryoo; Dharminder Chauhan; Kathe Balinski; Jerome Zeldis; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S Singhal; J Mehta; R Desikan; D Ayers; P Roberson; P Eddlemon; N Munshi; E Anaissie; C Wilson; M Dhodapkar; J Zeddis; B Barlogie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-11-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John D Shaughnessy; Fenghuang Zhan; Bart E Burington; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; Ichiro Hanamura; James P Stewart; Bob Kordsmeier; Christopher Randolph; David R Williams; Yan Xiao; Hongwei Xu; Joshua Epstein; Elias Anaissie; Somashekar G Krishna; Michele Cottler-Fox; Klaus Hollmig; Abid Mohiuddin; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Jeffrey Sawyer; Yazan Alsayed; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie Journal: Blood Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Attal; J L Harousseau; A M Stoppa; J J Sotto; J G Fuzibet; J F Rossi; P Casassus; H Maisonneuve; T Facon; N Ifrah; C Payen; R Bataille Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot; Elias Anaissie; John Shaughnessy; Erik Rasmussen; Frits van Rhee; Athanasios Fassas; Maurizio Zangari; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Choon Lee; Giampaolo Talamo; Raymond Thertulien; Elias Kiwan; Somashekar Krishna; Michele Fox; John Crowley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Xenofon Papanikolaou; Jackie Szymonifka; Adam Rosenthal; Christoph J Heuck; Alan Mitchell; Donald Johann; Jason Keller; Sarah Waheed; Saad Z Usmani; Frits Van Rhee; Clyde Bailey; Nathan Petty; Antje Hoering; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie Journal: Haematologica Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Shigeyuki Matsui; Richard Simon; Pingping Qu; John D Shaughnessy; Bart Barlogie; John Crowley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Idrees Mian; Denái R Milton; Nina Shah; Yago Nieto; Uday R Popat; Partow Kebriaei; Simrit Parmar; Betul Oran; Jatin J Shah; Elisabet E Manasanch; Robert Z Orlowski; Elizabeth J Shpall; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 6.860