PURPOSE: Dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab (PT) is feasible. Lapatinib is effective in the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a pilot study of dose-dense AC followed by PT plus lapatinib (PTL) followed by trastuzumab plus lapatinib (TL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stages I to III, HER2-positive breast cancer and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or = 50% were enrolled. Treatment consisted of AC (60 mg/m(2) and 600 mg/m(2)) for 4 cycles every 2 weeks (with pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2) followed by paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) for 12 doses weekly plus trastuzumab and lapatinib. Trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg weekly during paclitaxel then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks after paclitaxel) and lapatinib (1,000 mg daily) were given for 1 year. The primary end points were feasibility defined as > or = 80% patients completing the PTL phase without a dose delay/reduction and a cardiac event rate of < or = 4%. RESULTS: From March 2007 to April 2008, we enrolled 95 patients. Median age was 46 years (range, 28 to 73 years). At a median follow-up of 22 months, 92 were evaluable. Of the 92 patients, 41 patients (45%) withdrew for PTL-specific toxicities. Overall, 40 (43%) of 92 patients had lapatinib dose reductions, and 27 (29%) of 92 patients had grade 3 diarrhea. Three patients (3%) had congestive heart failure; three patients dropped out because of significant asymptomatic LVEF decline during PTL followed by TL. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense AC followed by PTL and then followed by TL was not feasible because of a high rate of lapatinib dose reduction, mostly caused by unacceptable grade 3 diarrhea. Lapatinib (1,000 mg/d) was not feasible combined with weekly PT.
PURPOSE: Dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab (PT) is feasible. Lapatinib is effective in the treatment of humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive metastatic breast cancer. We conducted a pilot study of dose-dense AC followed by PT plus lapatinib (PTL) followed by trastuzumab plus lapatinib (TL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stages I to III, HER2-positive breast cancer and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > or = 50% were enrolled. Treatment consisted of AC (60 mg/m(2) and 600 mg/m(2)) for 4 cycles every 2 weeks (with pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2) followed by paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) for 12 doses weekly plus trastuzumab and lapatinib. Trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg weekly during paclitaxel then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks after paclitaxel) and lapatinib (1,000 mg daily) were given for 1 year. The primary end points were feasibility defined as > or = 80% patients completing the PTL phase without a dose delay/reduction and a cardiac event rate of < or = 4%. RESULTS: From March 2007 to April 2008, we enrolled 95 patients. Median age was 46 years (range, 28 to 73 years). At a median follow-up of 22 months, 92 were evaluable. Of the 92 patients, 41 patients (45%) withdrew for PTL-specific toxicities. Overall, 40 (43%) of 92 patients had lapatinib dose reductions, and 27 (29%) of 92 patients had grade 3 diarrhea. Three patients (3%) had congestive heart failure; three patients dropped out because of significant asymptomatic LVEF decline during PTL followed by TL. CONCLUSION: Dose-dense AC followed by PTL and then followed by TL was not feasible because of a high rate of lapatinib dose reduction, mostly caused by unacceptable grade 3 diarrhea. Lapatinib (1,000 mg/d) was not feasible combined with weekly PT.
Authors: Ian Smith; Marion Procter; Richard D Gelber; Sébastien Guillaume; Andrea Feyereislova; Mitch Dowsett; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Gabriella Mariani; Jose Baselga; Manfred Kaufmann; David Cameron; Richard Bell; Jonas Bergh; Robert Coleman; Andrew Wardley; Nadia Harbeck; Roberto I Lopez; Peter Mallmann; Karen Gelmon; Nicholas Wilcken; Erik Wist; Pedro Sánchez Rovira; Martine J Piccart-Gebhart Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Charles E Geyer; John Forster; Deborah Lindquist; Stephen Chan; C Gilles Romieu; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Agnieszka Jagiello-Gruszfeld; John Crown; Arlene Chan; Bella Kaufman; Dimosthenis Skarlos; Mario Campone; Neville Davidson; Mark Berger; Cristina Oliva; Stephen D Rubin; Steven Stein; David Cameron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Vicente Valero; Daniel J Booser; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Zia Rahman; Richard L Theriault; Ronald Walters; Edgardo Rivera; Terry L Smith; Frankie A Holmes; Emma Hoy; Debra K Frye; Nikki Manuel; Shu-Wan Kau; Marsha D McNeese; Eric Strom; Eva Thomas; Kelly Hunt; Fred Ames; Donald Berry; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Martine J Piccart-Gebhart; Marion Procter; Brian Leyland-Jones; Aron Goldhirsch; Michael Untch; Ian Smith; Luca Gianni; Jose Baselga; Richard Bell; Christian Jackisch; David Cameron; Mitch Dowsett; Carlos H Barrios; Günther Steger; Chiun-Shen Huang; Michael Andersson; Moshe Inbar; Mikhail Lichinitser; István Láng; Ulrike Nitz; Hiroji Iwata; Christoph Thomssen; Caroline Lohrisch; Thomas M Suter; Josef Rüschoff; Tamás Suto; Victoria Greatorex; Carol Ward; Carolyn Straehle; Eleanor McFadden; M Stella Dolci; Richard D Gelber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-10-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Noor Al-Dasooqi; Joanne M Bowen; Rachel J Gibson; Thomas Sullivan; Jude Lees; Dorothy M Keefe Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Andrew D Seidman; Donald Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Lyndsay Harris; Hyman Muss; P Kelly Marcom; Grandella Gipson; Harold Burstein; Diana Lake; Charles L Shapiro; Peter Ungaro; Larry Norton; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roberto A Leon-Ferre; Edith A Perez; David W Hillman; Celyne Bueno; Alejandra T Perez; Beiyun Chen; Robert B Jenkins; Donald W Northfelt; David B Johnson; Robert L Carolla; Robin T Zon; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Noam Ponde; Ian Bradbury; Matteo Lambertini; Michael Ewer; Christine Campbell; Helene Ameels; Dimitrios Zardavas; Serena Di Cosimo; José Baselga; Jens Huober; Miguel Izquierdo; Debora Fumagalli; Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic; Marion Maetens; Nadia Harbeck; Lajos Pusztai; Michael Berghorn; Young-Hyuck Im; Manuel Ruiz Borrego; Dar-Ren Chen; Richard Rodeheffer; Martine Piccart; Thomas Suter; Evandro de Azambuja Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Karen A Cadoo; Patrick G Morris; Elizabeth P Cowell; Sujata Patil; Clifford A Hudis; Heather L McArthur Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Neil M Iyengar; Monica N Fornier; Steven M Sugarman; Maria Theodoulou; Tiffany A Troso-Sandoval; Gabriella M D'Andrea; Pamela R Drullinsky; Devika Gajria; Shari B Goldfarb; Elizabeth A Comen; Diana E Lake; Shanu Modi; Tiffany A Traina; Mario E Lacouture; Melanie F Chen; Sujata Patil; José Baselga; Larry Norton; Clifford A Hudis; Chau T Dang Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 3.225