Literature DB >> 20479105

Implementation and evaluation of carousel dispensing technology in a university medical center pharmacy.

Jack Temple1, Brad Ludwig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The implementation of carousel dispensing technology (CDT) at a university medical center pharmacy and the associated changes in drug distribution are described.
METHODS: An evaluation of CDT was conducted in three phases: before implementation, during implementation, and after implementation. The preimplementation phase consisted of data collection and facility planning leading up to the physical installation. The implementation phase included the physical installation, carousel medication assignment, and user training. The postimplementation phase included data collection and analysis. The data collected were used to compare preimplementation and postimplementation time studies, labor requirements, inventory turns, and accuracy rates.
RESULTS: The estimated labor savings comparing the preimplementation and postimplementation time studies for automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) refills, first-dose requests, supplemental cart fill, and medication procurement totaled 2.6 full-time equivalents (FTEs). After departmental reorganization, a net reduction of 2.0 technician FTEs was achieved. The average turnaround time for stat medication requests using CDT was 7.19 minutes, and the percentage of doses filled in less than 20 minutes was 95.1%. After implementing CDT, the average accuracy rate for all dispense requests increased from 99.02% to 99.48%. The inventory carrying cost was reduced by $25,059.
CONCLUSION: CDT improved the overall efficiency and accuracy of medication dispensing in a university medical center pharmacy. Workflow efficiencies achieved in ADC refill, first-dose dispensing, supplemental cart fill, and the medication procurement process allowed the department to reduce the amount of technician labor required to support the medication distribution process, as well as reallocate technician labor to other areas in need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479105     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  4 in total

1.  Safeguarding the process of drug administration with an emphasis on electronic support tools.

Authors:  Hanna M Seidling; Anette Lampert; Kristina Lohmann; Julia T Schiele; Alexander J F Send; Diana Witticke; Walter E Haefeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Critical Evaluation of Pharmacy Automation and Robotic Systems: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Anthony M Boyd; Bruce W Chaffee
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2018-07-09

3.  Evaluating the safety and efficiency of robotic dispensing systems.

Authors:  Tomoki Takase; Norio Masumoto; Naoki Shibatani; Yusaku Matsuoka; Fumiaki Tanaka; Masaki Hirabatake; Hiroko Kashiwagi; Itaru Nishioka; Hiroaki Ikesue; Tohru Hashida; Naoshi Koide; Nobuyuki Muroi
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2022-10-01

Review 4.  Automation of in-hospital pharmacy dispensing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Batson; Ana Herranz; Nicolas Rohrbach; Michela Canobbio; Stephen A Mitchell; Pascal Bonnabry
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-04-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.