Literature DB >> 20479101

Intensive glucose control in the management of diabetes mellitus and inpatient hyperglycemia.

Angela O Shogbon1, Steven B Levy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The current evidence on intensive glycemic control in the inpatient and outpatient settings and its implications to practice are reviewed.
SUMMARY: Poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes is associated with microvascular and macrovascular complications. Various clinical trials involving patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes have revealed the benefits of intensive glycemic control in delaying the onset and progression of microvascular complications of diabetes. However, while long-term epidemiologic trials and a meta-analysis have shown a benefit of intensive glycemic control in reducing the incidence of macrovascular complications, recent clinical trials have not found similar benefits. The American Diabetes Association (ADA), American College of Endocrinology (ACE), and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists recommend intensive control of glycosylated hemoglobin and plasma glucose at specified goals. Hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. ACE and ADA recommend the use of an i.v. insulin infusion in critically ill inpatients with hyperglycemia. In noncritically ill inpatients, basal and bolus doses of insulin are recommended. The use of sliding-scale insulin as the sole therapy for inpatient hyperglycemia is discouraged. However, caution must be exercised to ensure a balance between controlling hyperglycemia and reducing the risk of hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSION: While intensive glycemic control is known to prevent or delay the occurrence of microvascular complications of diabetes, macrovascular benefits are still uncertain. Current evidence suggests that intensive glycemic control should be initiated as soon as possible after diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes in order to maximize potential long-term macrovascular benefits. Inpatient hyperglycemia should be managed appropriately to reduce morbidity and mortality, with great care taken to avoid and appropriately treat hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20479101     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  6 in total

1.  Diabetes-related alterations in the enteric nervous system and its microenvironment.

Authors:  Mária Bagyánszki; Nikolett Bódi
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2012-05-15

Review 2.  Management of patients with type 1 diabetes in the hospital.

Authors:  Divya Yogi-Morren; M Cecilia Lansang
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  The role of TNF-α G-308A promoter polymorphism in glycemic control in Type 2 diabetes patients.

Authors:  S I Al-Azzam; O F Khabour; K H Alzoubi; M W Ghanma; A Y Alhasan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Evaluation of an intensive insulin transition protocol in the intensive care unit setting: a before and after study.

Authors:  Leigh Anne Jacobson; Kathleen Jerguson; Leeanna Spiva; Danielle Fraser
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2012-03-31

5.  Safety of intravenous insulin aspart compared to regular human insulin in patients undergoing ICU monitoring post cardiac surgery: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Manoj Chawla; Harshad Malve; Harshvi Shah; Shwetal Shinde; Anil Bhoraskar
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2015-04-03

6.  Electronic dashboard-based remote glycemic management program reduces length of stay and readmission rate among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Yi-Jing Sheen; Chien-Chung Huang; Shih-Che Huang; Ching-Heng Lin; I-Te Lee; Wayne H-H Sheu
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.232

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.