Literature DB >> 2047903

Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking.

I Waldron1.   

Abstract

In the early twentieth century in the United States and other Western countries, women were much less likely than men to smoke cigarettes, due in part to widespread social disapproval of women's smoking. During the mid-twentieth century, growing social acceptance of women's smoking contributed to increased smoking adoption by women. Increased social acceptance of women's smoking was part of a general liberalization of norms concerning women's behavior, reflecting increasing equality between the sexes. These historical trends were due in part to increases in women's employment. However, in the contemporary period employment appears to have little or no effect on women's smoking. Sex role norms and general expectations concerning gender-appropriate behavior have had a variety of effects on gender differences in smoking. First, general characteristics of traditional sex roles, including men's greater social power and generally greater restrictions on women's behavior, contributed to widespread social pressures against women's smoking. Second, traditional sex role norms and expectations have fostered gender differences in personal characteristics and experiences which influence smoking adoption. For example, rebelliousness has been more expected and accepted for males, and greater rebelliousness among adolescent males has contributed to greater smoking adoption by males. Finally, certain aspects of sex roles have contributed to gender differences in appraisal of the costs and benefits of smoking. For example, physical attractiveness is emphasized more for females and the contemporary beauty ideal is very slender, so females are more likely to view weight control as a benefit of smoking. Several other hypotheses concerning the causes of gender differences in smoking are not supported by the available evidence. For example, it appears that women's generally greater concern with health has not contributed significantly to gender differences in the prevalence of smoking. Similarly, it appears that sex differences in physiological responses to smoking have made only minor contributions to gender differences in smoking adoption or cessation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2047903     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90157-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  75 in total

1.  From social taboo to "torch of freedom": the marketing of cigarettes to women.

Authors:  A Amos; M Haglund
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Gender differences in hypertension and hypertension awareness among young adults.

Authors:  Bethany Everett; Anna Zajacova
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2015

3.  The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on Health and Healthy Behaviour.

Authors:  Gabriella Conti; James Heckman; Rodrigo Pinto
Journal:  Econ J (London)       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  The sociodemographic pattern of tobacco cessation in the 1980s: results from a panel study of living condition surveys in Sweden.

Authors:  P Tillgren; B J Haglund; M Lundberg; A Romelsjö
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Familial aggregation of tobacco use behaviors among Amish men.

Authors:  Katie L Nugent; Amber Million-Mrkva; Joshua Backman; Sarah H Stephens; Robert M Reed; Peter Kochunov; Toni I Pollin; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Declining sex differences in mortality from lung cancer in high-income nations.

Authors:  Fred C Pampel
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-02

7.  Changing Patterns of Tobacco and Alcohol Co-Use by Gender in the United States, 1976-2010.

Authors:  Jonathan Daw; Kathryn M Nowotny; Jason D Boardman
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2013-03-26

8.  Psychosocial, behavioural, and health determinants of successful smoking cessation: a longitudinal study of Danish adults.

Authors:  M Osler; E Prescott
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The male-female health-survival paradox and sex differences in cohort life expectancy in Utah, Denmark, and Sweden 1850-1910.

Authors:  Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen; Heidi A Hanson; Anna Oksuzyan; Geraldine P Mineau; Kaare Christensen; Ken R Smith
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  The Decline of Smoking among Female Birth Cohorts in China in the 20(th) Century: A Case of Arrested Diffusion?

Authors:  Albert I Hermalin; Deborah S Lowry
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2012-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.