HIV, heroin and heterosexual relations.

This ethnographic study describes part of the social context in which heterosexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) may be taking place. Based on interviews with sex partners of intravenous (IV) drug users in an urban, African American community of the United States, the study documents the personal experience of 35 men and women to show how living with one's own and/or one's partner's heroin habit may structure one's response to public health information and one's possibility of becoming infected with HIV. As described by sex partners of intravenous drug users, people who use heroin habitually are drawn into social networks that are loosely organized according to their preferred route of drug administration, i.e. 'shooters' (intravenous) and 'tooters' (intranasal), both of which tend to exclude 'squares' (non-use). Social divisions such as these may slow rates of HIV transmission to those outside the drug life. But nevertheless, as sex partners explain, there are many types of social and sexual exchanges taking place among shooters, tooters and squares, including but not limited to the exchange of bodily fluids. Ethnography analyzes discursive representations of such exchanges, filling in and questioning the empty categories of epidemiological prediction. How does risky behavior actually figure in the lives of individuals who happen to fall in the category of 'sex partner'? How is sexual behavior shaped by drug use behavior? Being sexually involved with an IV drug user for some years alters a person's relative position betwixt and between the drug subculture, on the one hand, and mainstream pursuits of family, work and church, on the other. Differences in personal need and group identity create conflicts. Couples in long-term relationships develop rules to manage these. But in which terms will they interpret and negotiate the new threat of AIDS? If the strategic aspect of discursive representations of experience is taken into account, and if discursive representations are interpreted within appropriate social and historical contexts, they can provide a rich source of material for understanding the social impact of the AIDS epidemic. Without this discursive dimension, analytic power to interpret seroprevalence data cross-culturally would be lacking. In addition, and independently of the problem of interpreting seroprevalence data, ethnographic analysis links local, culturally-specific meanings through which AIDS is interpreted to our understanding of AIDS as a global phenomena.