Literature DB >> 20477898

An evaluation of survival and detection of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in broiler caecal contents using culture-based methods.

J D Rodgers1, F A Clifton-Hadley, C Marin, A B Vidal.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the culture specifications of the 2008 EU baseline survey for Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks at slaughter, by assessing the detection of thermophilic Campylobacter in chicken caecal contents by culture on selective agar with or without enrichment culture. Additionally, to assess the impact of sample storage time on Campylobacter detection. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Serial dilutions of pooled caeca samples in phosphate-buffered saline or Campylobacter-negative caecal contents were cultured micro-aerobically at 41.5°C on mCCDA, Karmali and Preston agars before and after enrichment in Exeter broth. Direct culture on mCCDA showed a higher isolation rate than for Karmali or Preston agars, but a similar isolation rate to enrichment. Enumeration of samples showed the numbers of viable bacteria dropped slightly during storage.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct culture on mCCDA was the most sensitive method for detection of Campylobacter, and samples with 10(4) CFU g(-1) were still detectable after 6 days. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Comparison of prevalence results from the 2008 EU baseline survey will need careful interpretation as the different media specified vary in their sensitivity to detect thermophilic Campylobacter. Delayed culture for up to 80 h after collection should have little impact on detection rate.
© 2010 Crown copyright, c/o the Librarian, Veterinary Laboratory Agency. Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20477898     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04748.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  6 in total

1.  Strain-Specific Differences in Survival of Campylobacter spp. in Naturally Contaminated Turkey Feces and Water.

Authors:  Lesley Good; William G Miller; Jeffrey Niedermeyer; Jason Osborne; Robin M Siletzky; Donna Carver; Sophia Kathariou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A Comparative Evaluation Study of Growth Conditions for Culturing the Isolates of Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  Ying-Hsin Hsieh; Steven Simpson; Khalil Kerdahi; Irshad M Sulaiman
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Campylobacter populations in wild and domesticated Mallard ducks (Anas platyrhynchos).

Authors:  Frances M Colles; Jan S Ali; Samuel K Sheppard; Noel D McCarthy; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.541

4.  Metagenomic analysis of isolation methods of a targeted microbe, Campylobacter jejuni, from chicken feces with high microbial contamination.

Authors:  Junhyung Kim; Jae-Ho Guk; Seung-Hyun Mun; Jae-Uk An; Hyokeun Song; Jinshil Kim; Sangryeol Ryu; Byeonghwa Jeon; Seongbeom Cho
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 14.650

5.  A Complex Competitive Exclusion Culture Reduces Campylobacter jejuni Colonization in Broiler Chickens at Slaughter Age In Vivo.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Benjamin Reichelt; Anika Friese; Uwe Roesler
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-11

6.  Bayesian analysis of culture and PCR methods for detection of Campylobacter spp. in broiler caecal samples.

Authors:  M E Arnold; E M Jones; J R Lawes; A B Vidal; F A Clifton-Hadley; J D Rodgers; L F Powell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.434

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.