Literature DB >> 20477782

The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery.

P A H Wyffels1, P Sergeant, P F Wouters.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: We investigated the ability of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing open chest surgery by comparing their respective correlations with cardiac output changes induced by leg elevation. Serial leg elevation manoeuvres were performed before and after sternotomy in 15 patients scheduled for elective off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Under closed chest conditions, both pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation correlated well with the induced cardiac output changes (r = 0.856, p = 0.002 and r = 0.897, p = 0.0012, respectively). These correlations were lost for both parameters following sternotomy. Our data show that pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation are valid predictors of fluid responsiveness under closed chest conditions but that this property no longer holds when the chest is open.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20477782     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06371.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  12 in total

1.  Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Zhiyong He; Hui Qiao; Wei Zhou; Yun Wang; Zhendong Xu; Xuehua Che; Jun Zhang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: What the Mind Does Not Know, the Eye Cannot See.

Authors:  Joshua A Bloomstone; Randal O Dull; Lais H C Navarro
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Fluid Therapy Today: Where are We?

Authors:  Giorgio Della Rocca; Luigi Vetrugno
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 4.  A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Filippo Bernasconi; Giulia T A Tramontano; Martin Langer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Goal-directed fluid therapy using stroke volume variation does not result in pulmonary fluid overload in thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.

Authors:  Sebastian Haas; Volker Eichhorn; Ted Hasbach; Constantin Trepte; Asad Kutup; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2012-06-21

7.  The correlation between the Trendelenburg position and the stroke volume variation.

Authors:  Jin Hye Min; Sang Eun Lee; Hong Sik Lee; Young Keun Chae; Yong Kyung Lee; Yoo Kang; Ui Jin Je
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-12-29

8.  Diagnosis Accuracy of Mean Arterial Pressure Variation during a Lung Recruitment Maneuver to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery with One-Lung Ventilation.

Authors:  Woon-Seok Kang; Chung-Sik Oh; Chulmin Park; Bo Mi Shin; Tae-Gyoon Yoon; Ka-Young Rhee; Nam-Sik Woo; Seong-Hyop Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jaap Jan Vos; Marieke Poterman; Pieternel Papineau Salm; Kai Van Amsterdam; Michel M R F Struys; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alain F Kalmar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: functional hemodynamics during surgery - should it be used for all high-risk cases?

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Marit Habicher; Michael Sander
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.