Literature DB >> 20475889

The effect of the antigen which elicits the bactericidal antibody and of the mouse-protective antigen on the growth of Bordetella pertussis in the mouse brain.

J M Dolby, J P Ackers, D E Dolby.   

Abstract

The effect of antigens of Bordetella pertussis and their antibodies on brain infections by B. pertussis in mice are suppression of an infection immediately, so that the initial 90% loss due to leakage from the brain is maintained or the numbers of bacteria are reduced even further, sometimes with complete sterilization particularly after a small lethal challenge of 10 LD 50 (mechanism 1), and a delayed antibacterial activity in vivo which does not begin until 3 days after challenge (mechanism 2). The first, immediate reaction is over in 2-3 days; the second is maintained from 3-4 days onwards, and results in elimination of the bacteria and protection of mice.The parts played in vivo in overcoming infection in these two ways by two antigens and their respective antibodies have been investigated. These antigens are a lipopolysaccharide capable of eliciting an antibody which is bactericidal in vitro in the presence of complement called the ;bactericidal antigen', and the mouse protective antigen.Considering first passive immunity, bactericidal antibody elicited by isolated antigen, and of high titre in vitro, is only very weakly active by mechanism (1) in vivo. Brains are seldom sterilized and mice not therefore protected. Antisera to whole cell vaccines whether they contain the ;bactericidal antigen' or not, or the protective antigen or not can more easily reduce infections by mechanism (1), eliminating small lethal challenges in some mice which are protected. A passive, intracerebrally protective antibody (PIPA) different from other known antibodies, has been postulated to account for this. Antisera to whole cell vaccine which is protective as defined in the potency assay, can, in addition to this, protect mice by mechanism (2) not only against 10 LD 50 but also 100 LD 50 challenge, and is the only antibody which can do this.These antibodies have been investigated by injecting them with the challenging organisms. The antibody effects described above are given by antisera stimulated by several injections and also by the concentrated serum immunoglobulins of once vaccinated mice. The antibody, which is bactericidal in vitro only, is in the 7 S globulin fraction of the serum of once vaccinated mice. The protective antibody capable of overcoming small and large challenges is in the 19 S and 11 S globulins. The antibody, PIPA, protecting against small lethal challenges only is in the fraction A(2) containing mainly 11 S globulin.In active immunization experiments the suppression of infection which immediately follows intracerebral vaccination, but which only lasts 2-3 days (mechanism 1), is not dependent on either ;bactericidal' or protective antigens but on a component present in all our whole cell vaccines. Vaccines which also had protective antigen eliminated the remaining infection at 4-6 days after challenge by mechanism (2).As in passive immunity, only the protective antigen can completely overcome 100 LD 50. Suppression of a small, lethal, intracerebral infection given 14 days after intraperitoneal vaccination by mechanism (1) may however be correlated with protective antigen.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 20475889      PMCID: PMC2131549          DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400046738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)        ISSN: 0022-1724


  16 in total

1.  The effects of humoral, cellular and non-specific immunity on intracerebral Bordetella pertussis infections in mice.

Authors:  J M Dolby; D E Dolby; C J Bronne-Shanbury
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1975-02

2.  The antigen of Bordetella pertussis that induces bactericidal antibody and its relationship to protection of mice.

Authors:  J P Ackers; J M Dolby
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1972-04

3.  Stimulation of non-specific resistance by heterologous endotoxins and experimental immunity to Bordetella pertussis in mice.

Authors:  T Iida; M Tajima
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  The antibody activities of 19S and 7S fractions from rabbit antisera to Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  J M Dolby; D E Dolby
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  The antibacterial effect of Bordetella pertussis antisera.

Authors:  J M Dolby
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Precipitation of human serum proteins by polyethyleneglycol.

Authors:  B Chesebro; S E Svehag
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Intracerebral mouse protection test for pertussis vaccine. I. Apparent absence of humoral protective antibody under the usual test conditions.

Authors:  A C Wardlaw; C M Jakus
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Passive protection of mice against intracerebral infections with Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  J M Dolby
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1972-12

9.  The influence of the route of immunization on the protection of mice infected intracerebrally with Bordetella pertussis.

Authors:  A F Standfast; J M Dolby
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1972-09

10.  Pertussis antibodies in the sera of children exposed to Bordetella pertussis by vaccination or infection.

Authors:  J M Dolby; S Stephens
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1973-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.