Literature DB >> 20473766

Establishment of a murine model of chronic corneal allograft dysfunction.

Hua Gao1, Weiyun Shi, Huaqing Gong, Yiqiang Wang, Ye Wang, Lixin Xie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish a murine model of chronic corneal allograft dysfunction (CCAD) that permits molecular evaluation of chronic allograft dysfunction after corneal transplantation.
METHODS: C57BL/6 (allogeneic), CB6F1 (semiallogeneic) and BALB/c (syngeneic) corneal grafts were transplanted orthotopically to BALB/c recipients and to the BALB/c mice as a control group. The follow-up time was more than 100 days. Graft survival time was monitored. Corneal endothelium was examined by alizarin red and PI/Hoechst stain. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes were examined by immunohistochemistry. Ultra-structure changes of the grafts were examined by electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Median graft survival times were 17 days, 85.5 days, and >100 days in allogeneic, semiallogeneic, and syngeneic groups respectively. Acute rejection episodes were observed only in the allogeneic group. A large amount of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocyte infiltration was present in allografts only in the allogeneic group, and few CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes were observed in grafts in other groups. Large amounts of apoptotic and necrotic cells could be seen in the allogeneic group. Endothelial cell density decreased, and few apoptotic cells could be detected in semiallogeneic and syngeneic groups. No apoptotic or necrotic endothelial cells were found in the control group. Ultra-structural characteristic changes mainly included fibrosis formation, endothelium atrophy, and degeneration in failed grafts among transplant groups, as determined by electron microscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in semiallogeneic and syngeneic groups after transplantation were similar to those observed during clinical study. Although differences between mouse strains and clinical situations remain to be explored, this murine model provides the basis for understanding the pathogenesis of CCAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473766     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1403-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  34 in total

1.  Corneal transplantation: how successful are we?

Authors:  A Waldock; S D Cook
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Corneal graft rejection: recent updates.

Authors:  Vivien M B Tham; Richard L Abbott
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2002

3.  Pathology of late endothelial failure: late endothelial failure of penetrating keratoplasty: study with light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  K D Bell; R J Campbell; W M Bourne
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Synergism of RAD and cyclosporin A in prevention of acute rat corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Alexander Reis; Mosaad Megahed; Thomas Reinhard; Erhard Godehardt; Christian Braunstein; Rainer Sundmacher
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Chronic kidney allograft reactions in rats.

Authors:  E White; W H Hildemann; Y Mullen
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Induction of carbon monoxide in donor animals prior to organ procurement reduces graft immunogenicity and inhibits chronic allograft dysfunction.

Authors:  Paulo Ney Aguiar Martins; Anja Reutzel-Selke; Anke Jurisch; Christian Denecke; Kirstin Attrot; Andreas Pascher; Katja Kotsch; Johann Pratschke; Peter Neuhaus; Hans-Dieter Volk; Stefan G Tullius
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Topical cyclosporine in pediatric keratoplasty.

Authors:  C Banu Cosar; Peter R Laibson; Elisabeth J Cohen; Christopher J Rapuano
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.018

8.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  J J Ing; H H Ing; L R Nelson; D O Hodge; W M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 9.  Transplantation of the cornea.

Authors:  D J Coster; K A Williams
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-09-21       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Progressive albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis in a rat model of chronic renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  J R Diamond; N L Tilney; J Frye; G Ding; J McElroy; I Pesek-Diamond; H Yang
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lymphocyte infiltration and activation in iris-ciliary body and anterior chamber of mice in corneal allograft rejection.

Authors:  Fu-Hua Wang; Min Chen; Ting Liu; Xin-Jie Zang; Hua-Qing Gong; Wei-Yun Shi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  A mouse model of lamellar intrastromal femtosecond laser keratotomy: ultra-structural, inflammatory, and wound healing responses.

Authors:  R I Angunawela; R Poh; S S Chaurasia; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.367

3.  Comparative study of corneal endothelial cell damage after femtosecond laser assisted deep stromal dissection.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Jingjing Zhang; Dapeng Sun; Wenjie Sui; Yangyang Zhang; Dongfang Li; Zhaoli Chen; Hua Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Laser Scanning In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Clear Grafts after Penetrating Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Dai Wang; Peng Song; Shuting Wang; Dapeng Sun; Yuexin Wang; Yangyang Zhang; Hua Gao
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Rapamycin Nano-Micelle Ophthalmic Solution Reduces Corneal Allograft Rejection by Potentiating Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells' Function.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yuexin Wang; Li Ma; Xin Wang; Hao Chi; Sai Zhang; Ting Liu; Zhiyuan Li; Demeng Xiang; Yanling Dong; Xianggen Wu; Weiyun Shi; Hua Gao
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.