Literature DB >> 20473192

Rethinking analytical strategies for surveillance of medical devices: the case of hip arthroplasty.

Sharon-Lise Normand1, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Art Sedrakyan, Ronald Kaczmarek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials that sometimes serve as the basis for device approval are small, short term, and generalizable to an increasingly smaller percentage of patients. Some of the most common and challenging devices are those used in hip replacement. Artificial hips are implanted in thousands to alleviate pain caused by noninflammatory joint disease and to restore patient mobility. During 2004 in the United States, although 68% of hospital stays for partial or total hip replacements were for those aged 65 years and older, younger patients will account for 52% by 2030.
METHODS: Using hierarchical modeling, we propose a framework for combining information from premarket and postmarket settings. Our key assumption is that device performance characteristics and outcomes obtained from 1 cohort are related to device characteristics and outcomes of the same or similar devices observed in other cohorts. We illustrate methods by jointly modeling Harris Hip Scores (HHSs) and revision-success data from 1851 subjects who participated in 3 pivotal randomized or observational studies of artificial hips. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects participating in randomized studies had better 2-year HHS than those in observational studies (posterior mean increase in HHS = 4.1, posterior standard deviation = 0.6). Patients implanted with ceramic-on-polyethylene hip used in 1 study had higher 2-year HHS than those implanted with a different ceramic-on-polyethylene hip in another study (mean difference = 4.2, standard deviation = 0.6). Our approach is feasible and will advance regulatory science using a transparent and dynamic new paradigm for knowledge management throughout the total product life cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20473192     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181de9cfa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  How can we improve the recognition, reporting and resolution of medical device-related incidents in hospitals? A qualitative study of physicians and registered nurses.

Authors:  Julie Polisena; Anna Gagliardi; Tammy Clifford
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Post-marketing surveillance in the published medical and grey literature for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheters: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Polisena; Alan J Forster; Karen Cimon; Danielle Rabb
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-10

Review 3.  Application of a Causal Discovery Algorithm to the Analysis of Arthroplasty Registry Data.

Authors:  Camden Cheek; Huiyong Zheng; Brian R Hallstrom; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-22

Review 4.  Long-term active surveillance of implantable medical devices: an analysis of factors determining whether current registries are adequate to expose safety and efficacy problems.

Authors:  Samprit Banerjee; Bruce Campbell; Josh Rising; Allan Coukell; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-07-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.