Literature DB >> 20472694

Improving the long-term sustainability of health aid: are Global Health Partnerships leading the way?

Rebecca Dodd1, Christopher Lane.   

Abstract

Over the last decade development assistance for health has more than doubled. This increase provides an unprecedented opportunity to scale up health services, and in doing so, achieve the health Millennium Development Goals. However, sustaining scaling up will in turn require sustainable donor support until domestic health financing can substitute for it. The provision of long-term predictable finance is of particular concern in health because the bulk of costs are recurrent and many interventions require sustained, multi-year support to be successful. This is also true for health systems strengthening efforts. As the bulk of new aid resources flow through Global Health Partnerships (GHPs), their ability to make long-term commitments is critical to health systems development. In order to better understand the constraints that prevent development partners from making long-term commitments of health aid, the World Health Organization reviewed the practices of seven major health partners in committing development assistance funds over the long term. The review found increasing evidence of long-term commitments of aid for health in each of the seven agencies. The GHPs and their funders have been at the forefront of this trend, pioneering many of the new approaches. The study concludes that all partners have scope to improve the duration of aid within existing rules and regulations, and that the main constraints to doing so are political. Predictability is even more of a concern in current global economic circumstances, as access to resources begins to be squeezed. In this context it is important that we learn from GHPs, which have successfully tested innovative approaches to both raising and disbursing health funds. The prospects for change associated with the new administration in the United States-the largest health donor and the most unpredictable, but also a major supporter of GHPs-make this task even more urgent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472694     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  6 in total

1.  "More money for health - more health for the money": a human resources for health perspective.

Authors:  James Campbell; Iain Jones; Desmond Whyms
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2011-07-15

2.  Global Health Training Collaborations: Lessons Learned and Best Practices.

Authors:  Kathy Z Chang; Kristina Gracey; Brooke Lamparello; Bridget Nandawula; Nancy Pandhi
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Aid effectiveness in rebuilding the Afghan health system: a reflection.

Authors:  Suraya Dalil; William Newbrander; Benjamin Loevinsohn; Ahmad Jan Naeem; James Griffin; Peter Salama; Faiz Mohammad Momand
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2014-06-12

4.  Factors influencing the uptake of cervical cancer screening services in Tanzania: A health system perspective from national and district levels.

Authors:  Anitha M Mugassa; Gasto Frumence
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-10-08

5.  Building the foundations of an informatics agenda for global health - 2011 workshop report.

Authors:  Muzna Mirza; Mary Kratz; Donna Medeiros; Jamie Pina; Janise Richards; Xiaohui Zhang; Hamish Fraser; Christopher Bailey; Ramesh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2012-05-17

6.  Clinical Evaluation of an Affordable Qualitative Viral Failure Assay for HIV Using Dried Blood Spots in Uganda.

Authors:  Sheila N Balinda; Pascale Ondoa; Ekwaro A Obuku; Aletta Kliphuis; Isaac Egau; Michelle Bronze; Lordwin Kasambula; Rob Schuurman; Nicole Spieker; Tobias F Rinke de Wit; Cissy Kityo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.