Literature DB >> 20472353

Estrogen/progesterone receptor negativity and HER2 positivity predict locoregional recurrence in patients with T1a,bN0 breast cancer.

Jeffrey M Albert1, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo, Merih Guray, Aysegul Sahin, Eric A Strom, Welela Tereffe, Wendy A Woodward, Susan L Tucker, Kelly K Hunt, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Thomas A Buchholz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data have suggested that the molecular features of breast cancer are important determinants of outcome; however, few studies have correlated these features with locoregional recurrence (LRR). In the present study, we evaluated estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as predictors of LRR in patients with lymph node-negative disease and tumors < or = 1cm, because these patients often do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy or trastuzumab. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The data from 911 patients with stage T1a,bN0 breast cancer who had received definitive treatment at our institution between 1997 and 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. We prospectively analyzed ER/PR/HER2 expression from the archival tissue blocks of 756 patients. These 756 patients represented the cohort for the present study.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 6.0 years, the 5- and 8-year Kaplan-Meier LRR rate was 1.6% and 5.9%, respectively, with no difference noted in those who underwent breast conservation therapy vs. mastectomy (p=.347). The 8-year LRR rates were greater in the patients with ER-negative (10.6% vs. 4.2%, p=.016), PR-negative (9.0% vs. 4.2%, p=.009), or HER2-positive (17.5% vs. 3.9%, p=0.009) tumors. On multivariate analysis, ER-negative and PR-negative disease (hazard ratio, 2.37; p=.046) and HER2-positive disease (hazard ratio, 3.13, p=.016) independently predicted for LRR.
CONCLUSION: Patients with ER/PR-negative or HER2-positive T1a,bN0 breast cancer had a greater risk of LRR. Therapeutic strategies, such as the use of chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2 therapies, should be considered for future clinical trials for these patients. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472353     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Triple-negative subtype predicts poor overall survival and high locoregional relapse in inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Pamela K Allen; Tse K Yu; Wendy A Woodward; Naoto T Ueno; Anthony Lucci; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Yun Gong; Melissa L Bondy; Wei Yang; Jie S Willey; Massimo Cristofanilli; Vicente Valero; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Increased risk of locoregional recurrence for women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy compared with breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Bassam S Abdulkarim; Julie Cuartero; John Hanson; Jean Deschênes; David Lesniak; Siham Sabri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Association of HER2 Overexpression and Prognosis in Small (T1N0) Primary Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Joachim Rom; Claudia Schumacher; Oleg Gluz; Josef Höfler; Sebastian Eidt; Christoph Domschke; Frederik Marmé; Ulrike Nitz; Christof Sohn; Andreas Schneeweiss
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Age and survival estimates in patients who have node-negative T1ab breast cancer by breast cancer subtype.

Authors:  Rachel L Theriault; Jennifer K Litton; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Huiqin Chen; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Mariana Chavez-Macgregor; Phuong K Morrow; Wendy A Woodward; Aysegul Sahin; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Basal subtype of invasive breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of true recurrence after conventional breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Jennifer Y Wo; Paul L Nguyen; Rita F Abi Raad; Meera Sreedhara; Andrzej Niemierko; Phoebe E Freer; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jennifer R Bellon; Julia S Wong; Barbara L Smith; Jay R Harris; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Molecular Subtypes and Local-Regional Control of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Simona Maria Fragomeni; Andrew Sciallis; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

Review 7.  Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.

Authors:  D Ribnikar; J M Ribeiro; D Pinto; B Sousa; A C Pinto; E Gomes; E C Moser; M J Cardoso; F Cardoso
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-04

8.  Multidisciplinary considerations in the implementation of the findings from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 study: a practice-changing trial.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Anthony Lucci; Isabelle Bedrosian; Gildy V Babiera; Rosa F Hwang; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Karen Hoffman; Jennifer K Litton; Aysegul A Sahin; Wei Yang; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Thomas A Buchholz; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  HER2 status in molecular apocrine breast cancer: associations with clinical, pathological, and molecular features.

Authors:  Wenwen Guo; Wei Wang; Yun Zhu; Xiaojing Zhu; Zhongyuan Shi; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 10.  Molecular Biology in the Breast Clinics-Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vani Parmar; Nita S Nair; Purvi Thakkar; Garvit Chitkara
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.