Klaus-Helmut Schmidt1, Stefan Diestel. 1. Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Technical University of Dortmund, Ardeystr. 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany. schmidtkh@ifado.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the influential Job Demands-Control (JD-C) model developed by Karasek (1979; Karasek and Theorell, 1990), job strain is expected to result from high job demands and low job control as well as an interaction between both job characteristics. Previous research, however, has found such an interaction only rarely or inconsistently.It has been suggested that the conceptualization of the control variable (formerly referred to as decision latitude) may be particularly responsible for the lack of supportive findings. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at clarifying this issue by contrasting a focused measure of control with a traditional measure of decision latitude in their relations to job strain of health care workers. The measure of decision latitude encompassed a wide range of job characteristics including control, task variety, and learning opportunities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted with job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion as criterion measures of job strain. SETTING: A supra-regional organization for residential elderly care with 11 nursing homes located in a federal state in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires were distributed to the whole nursing staff, of which 379 filled in the questionnaire during normal working hours (68% participation rate). METHODS: In addition to confirmatory factor analyses, descriptive statistics, and bivariate correlations, hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for testing the corresponding interaction effects. RESULTS: Findings confirmed the assumption that the focused measure of control and the traditional measure of decision latitude represent distinct, yet correlated factors. Furthermore, findings revealed a significant interaction effect between job demands and control on all outcomes considered. By way of contrast, there was no equivalent interaction effect between job demands and decision latitude. In line with the JD-C model, the adverse influence of increasing demands on job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion were reduced with increasing job control. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the opportunities of health care workers to control work scheduling and the way of performing given tasks can make them less vulnerable against the adverse effects of high job demands.
BACKGROUND: According to the influential Job Demands-Control (JD-C) model developed by Karasek (1979; Karasek and Theorell, 1990), job strain is expected to result from high job demands and low job control as well as an interaction between both job characteristics. Previous research, however, has found such an interaction only rarely or inconsistently.It has been suggested that the conceptualization of the control variable (formerly referred to as decision latitude) may be particularly responsible for the lack of supportive findings. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed at clarifying this issue by contrasting a focused measure of control with a traditional measure of decision latitude in their relations to job strain of health care workers. The measure of decision latitude encompassed a wide range of job characteristics including control, task variety, and learning opportunities. DESIGN: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted with job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion as criterion measures of job strain. SETTING: A supra-regional organization for residential elderly care with 11 nursing homes located in a federal state in Germany. PARTICIPANTS: Questionnaires were distributed to the whole nursing staff, of which 379 filled in the questionnaire during normal working hours (68% participation rate). METHODS: In addition to confirmatory factor analyses, descriptive statistics, and bivariate correlations, hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed for testing the corresponding interaction effects. RESULTS: Findings confirmed the assumption that the focused measure of control and the traditional measure of decision latitude represent distinct, yet correlated factors. Furthermore, findings revealed a significant interaction effect between job demands and control on all outcomes considered. By way of contrast, there was no equivalent interaction effect between job demands and decision latitude. In line with the JD-C model, the adverse influence of increasing demands on job satisfaction, psychosomatic complaints and emotional exhaustion were reduced with increasing job control. CONCLUSIONS: Extending the opportunities of health care workers to control work scheduling and the way of performing given tasks can make them less vulnerable against the adverse effects of high job demands.
Authors: Isik U Zeytinoglu; Margaret Denton; Catherine Brookman; Sharon Davies; Firat K Sayin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Giuseppe La Torre; Cristina Sestili; Alice Mannocci; Alessandra Sinopoli; Massimiliano De Paolis; Sara De Francesco; Laura Rapaccini; Marco Barone; Valentina Iodice; Bruno Lojodice; Sabina Sernia; Simone De Sio; Angela Del Cimmuto; Maria De Giusti Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Basil Benduri Kaburi; Fred Yaw Bio; Chrysantus Kubio; Donne Kofi Ameme; Ernest Kenu; Samuel Oko Sackey; Edwin Andrew Afari Journal: Pan Afr Med J Date: 2019-08-23