Literature DB >> 20472119

Length of the endometrial cavity as measured by uterine sounding and ultrasonography in women of different parities.

Renata Canteiro1, M Valeria Bahamondes, Arlete dos Santos Fernandes, Ximena Espejo-Arce, Nadia M Marchi, Luis Bahamondes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In view of current controversies regarding the need for new, shorter intrauterine devices (IUDs) that would reduce expulsion rates in nulligravida, endometrial cavity length was measured in women of different parities using uterine sounding and ultrasonography. STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed including 570 women of 17-52 years of age, 260 of whom were nulligravida and 310 parous.
RESULTS: The difference in mean length between measurements taken by uterine sounding and ultrasonography was 0.28 cm. Mean endometrial cavity length was 3.84+/-0.03 cm (mean+/-S.E.M.) in nulligravida and 4.25+/-0.03 cm in parous women according to uterine sounding (p<.001) and 3.70+/-0.03 cm and 3.84+/-0.03 cm, respectively, according to ultrasonography (p=.006).
CONCLUSIONS: By either technique, mean length of the endometrial cavity was >3.6 cm, the length of the most common IUDs, the TCu380A and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Therefore, the issue appears controversial for developing new, shorter IUDs, since current models fit most women, including nulligravida, albeit one third of the women of our sample showed endometrial length shorter than 3.2 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472119     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Three-dimensional measurement and analysis of morphological parameters of the uterus in infertile women.

Authors:  Yankun Feng; Shaojing Zhang; Ying Zhou; Guibing He; Liting Hong; Li Shi; Jianmei Wang; Ping Zhang; Lidong Zhai
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-04

2.  The ElectroUteroGraph: A Novel Tool for Assessing Uterine Contractions of Non-Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Julius Georgiou; Konstantinos Lekkas; Giorgos Varnava; Marios Sophocleous; Andreas Michaelides; Vasilios Tanos
Journal:  IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Precision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devices.

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Ansgar Pett; Sohela Jandi; Thomas Hasskamp; Patrick Rowe; Marc Vrijens
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-04-30

4.  Ex-vivo forces associated with intrauterine device placement and perforation: a biomechanical evaluation of hysterectomy specimens.

Authors:  Jane Duncan; Kathryn Fay; Jessica Sanders; Benjamin Cappiello; Jane Saviers-Steiger; David K Turok
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Parity and the risks of adverse birth outcomes: a retrospective study among Chinese.

Authors:  Li Lin; Ciyong Lu; Weiqing Chen; Chunrong Li; Vivian Yawei Guo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.