BACKGROUND:Misoprostol has been studied intensively to produce cervical dilatation. To date, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness, safety or acceptability of this treatment for repeat intrauterine device insertions. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the consecutive use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Women who had used their first LNG-IUS for 4 years and 3 to 9 months and opted for an immediate replacement with a second LNG-IUS received a single sublingual dose of 400 mcg misoprostol or placebo 3 h prior to the LNG-IUS insertion. RESULTS: The proportion of easy insertions as judged by the investigator was 93% (40/43) in subjects randomized to misoprostol and 91% (42/46) in the placebo group (p=1.0 for the difference of proportions). No or mild pain at insertion was reported by 37% and 35% of subjects in the misoprostol and placebo groups, respectively. However, adverse events related to the study drug were more common in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION:Sublingual misoprostol did not have a significant effect on the ease of insertion in subjects having a repeat insertion of the LNG-IUS.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Misoprostol has been studied intensively to produce cervical dilatation. To date, no studies have evaluated the effectiveness, safety or acceptability of this treatment for repeat intrauterine device insertions. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the consecutive use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). Women who had used their first LNG-IUS for 4 years and 3 to 9 months and opted for an immediate replacement with a second LNG-IUS received a single sublingual dose of 400 mcg misoprostol or placebo 3 h prior to the LNG-IUS insertion. RESULTS: The proportion of easy insertions as judged by the investigator was 93% (40/43) in subjects randomized to misoprostol and 91% (42/46) in the placebo group (p=1.0 for the difference of proportions). No or mild pain at insertion was reported by 37% and 35% of subjects in the misoprostol and placebo groups, respectively. However, adverse events related to the study drug were more common in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Sublingual misoprostol did not have a significant effect on the ease of insertion in subjects having a repeat insertion of the LNG-IUS.
Authors: Amna I Dermish; David K Turok; Janet C Jacobson; Marie E S Flores; Molly McFadden; Kathy Burke Journal: Contraception Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: David K Turok; Eve Espey; Alison B Edelman; Pamela S Lotke; Eva H Lathrop; Stephanie B Teal; Janet C Jacobson; Sara E Simonsen; Kenneth F Schulz Journal: Trials Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Luis Bahamondes; Diana Mansour; Christian Fiala; Andrew M Kaunitz; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson Journal: J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care Date: 2013-09-27
Authors: Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-07-29