Literature DB >> 20472095

Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900-MHz mobile phone radiation: Detection of apoptotic cell-death features.

Evangelia D Chavdoula1, Dimitris J Panagopoulos, Lukas H Margaritis.   

Abstract

In the present study we used a 6-min daily exposure of dipteran flies, Drosophila melanogaster, to GSM-900MHz (Global System for Mobile Telecommunications) mobile phone electromagnetic radiation (EMR), to compare the effects between the continuous and four different intermittent exposures of 6min total duration, and also to test whether intermittent exposure provides any cumulative effects on the insect's reproductive capacity as well as on the induction of apoptotic cell death. According to our previous experiments, a 6-min continuous exposure per day for 5 days to GSM-900MHz and DCS-1800MHz (Digital Cellular System) mobile phone radiation, brought about a large decrease in the insect's reproductive capacity, as defined by the number of F(1) pupae. This decrease was found to be non-thermal and correlated with an increased percentage of induced fragmented DNA in the egg chambers' cells at early- and mid-oogenesis. In the present experiments we show that intermittent exposure also decreases the reproductive capacity and alters the actin-cytoskeleton network of the egg chambers, another known aspect of cell death that was not investigated in previous experiments, and that the effect is also due to DNA fragmentation. Intermittent exposures with 10-min intervals between exposure sessions proved to be almost equally effective as continuous exposure of the same total duration, whereas longer intervals between the exposures seemed to allow the organism the time required to recover and partly overcome the above-mentioned effects of the GSM exposure. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20472095     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  Possible cause for altered spatial cognition of prepubescent rats exposed to chronic radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation.

Authors:  Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan; Raju Suresh Kumar; Kalesh M Karun; Satheesha B Nayak; P Gopalakrishna Bhat
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 2.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation-induced behavioral changes and their possible basis.

Authors:  Sareesh Naduvil Narayanan; Raghu Jetti; Kavindra Kumar Kesari; Raju Suresh Kumar; Satheesha B Nayak; P Gopalakrishna Bhat
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Mobile-phone radiation-induced perturbation of gene-expression profiling, redox equilibrium and sporadic-apoptosis control in the ovary of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Areti K Manta; Deppie Papadopoulou; Alexander P Polyzos; Adamantia F Fragopoulou; Aikaterini S Skouroliakou; Dimitris Thanos; Dimitrios J Stravopodis; Lukas H Margaritis
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Neuroprotective effects of sevoflurane against electromagnetic pulse-induced brain injury through inhibition of neuronal oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Authors:  Bin Deng; Hao Xu; Jin Zhang; Jin Wang; Li-Chun Han; Li-Ya Li; Guang-Li Wu; Yan-Ning Hou; Guo-Zhen Guo; Qiang Wang; Han-Fei Sang; Li-Xian Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Searching for the perfect wave: the effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cells.

Authors:  Lisa Gherardini; Gastone Ciuti; Selene Tognarelli; Caterina Cinti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Radiofrequency radiations induced genotoxic and carcinogenic effects on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) root tip cells.

Authors:  Sadaf Tabasum Qureshi; Sajjad Ahmed Memon; Abdul Rasool Abassi; Mahboob Ali Sial; Farooque Ali Bughio
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  A histone deacetylase 7-derived peptide promotes vascular regeneration via facilitating 14-3-3γ phosphorylation.

Authors:  Junyao Yang; Ana Moraga; Jing Xu; Yue Zhao; Peiyi Luo; Ka Hou Lao; Andriana Margariti; Qiang Zhao; Wei Ding; Gang Wang; Min Zhang; Lei Zheng; Zhongyi Zhang; Yanhua Hu; Wen Wang; Lisong Shen; Alberto Smith; Ajay M Shah; Qian Wang; Lingfang Zeng
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 8.  Human‑made electromagnetic fields: Ion forced‑oscillation and voltage‑gated ion channel dysfunction, oxidative stress and DNA damage (Review).

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Andreas Karabarbounis; Igor Yakymenko; George P Chrousos
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 9.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.