B Trivedi1, M Marshall, J Belcher, E Roddy. 1. Arthritis Research Campaign National Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, United Kingdom. bansari191@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the methods used in population-based epidemiological studies to diagnose radiographic foot osteoarthritis (OA) and to estimate the population prevalence of radiographic foot OA. METHOD: Electronic databases searched included Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Ageline (inception to May 2009). The search strategy combined search terms for radiography, OA, foot, and specific foot joints. Predetermined selection criteria were applied. Data extracted from each paper included: sample population, radiographic views taken, foot joints examined, scoring system used, definition of OA applied, reliability of radiographic scoring and prevalence of radiographic OA in the foot. RESULTS: Titles and abstracts of 1035 papers were reviewed and full-texts of 21 papers were obtained. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and a further 12 papers were included after screening references. Radiographic views were frequently not specified (NS) but a combination of antero-posterior (AP) and lateral (Lat) views was most commonly reported. The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint was the most commonly examined joint (n=20, 74%). Nineteen studies (70%) used the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading system, 95% of which defined OA as K&L grade> or =2. Estimates of the prevalence of radiographic first MTP joint OA (defined as K&L> or =2) in middle-aged to older adults ranged from 6.3 to 39%. Significant statistical heterogeneity prevented pooling of prevalence estimates. CONCLUSION: There are comparatively few studies examining radiographic foot OA. Existing studies mainly focus on the first MTP joint and use the K&L grading system. Future studies are needed to quantify the prevalence of radiographic OA at the different joint complexes within the foot. Copyright 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the methods used in population-based epidemiological studies to diagnose radiographic foot osteoarthritis (OA) and to estimate the population prevalence of radiographic foot OA. METHOD: Electronic databases searched included Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Ageline (inception to May 2009). The search strategy combined search terms for radiography, OA, foot, and specific foot joints. Predetermined selection criteria were applied. Data extracted from each paper included: sample population, radiographic views taken, foot joints examined, scoring system used, definition of OA applied, reliability of radiographic scoring and prevalence of radiographic OA in the foot. RESULTS: Titles and abstracts of 1035 papers were reviewed and full-texts of 21 papers were obtained. Fifteen papers met inclusion criteria and a further 12 papers were included after screening references. Radiographic views were frequently not specified (NS) but a combination of antero-posterior (AP) and lateral (Lat) views was most commonly reported. The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint was the most commonly examined joint (n=20, 74%). Nineteen studies (70%) used the Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) grading system, 95% of which defined OA as K&L grade> or =2. Estimates of the prevalence of radiographic first MTP joint OA (defined as K&L> or =2) in middle-aged to older adults ranged from 6.3 to 39%. Significant statistical heterogeneity prevented pooling of prevalence estimates. CONCLUSION: There are comparatively few studies examining radiographic foot OA. Existing studies mainly focus on the first MTP joint and use the K&L grading system. Future studies are needed to quantify the prevalence of radiographic OA at the different joint complexes within the foot. Copyright 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Prue Molyneux; Sarah Stewart; Catherine Bowen; Richard Ellis; Keith Rome; Matthew Carroll Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Jason S Kim; Annunziato Amendola; Alexej Barg; Judith Baumhauer; James W Brodsky; Daniel M Cushman; Tyler A Gonzalez; Dennis Janisse; Michael J Jurynec; J Lawrence Marsh; Carolyn M Sofka; Thomas O Clanton; Donald D Anderson Journal: Foot Ankle Orthop Date: 2022-10-15
Authors: Robert-Jan O de Muinck Keizer; Manouk Backes; Siem A Dingemans; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Molly A Day; Michael Ho; Kevin Dibbern; Karan Rao; Qiang An; Donald D Anderson; J Lawrence Marsh Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Edward Roddy; Helen Myers; Martin J Thomas; Michelle Marshall; Deborah D'Cruz; Hylton B Menz; John Belcher; Sara Muller; George Peat Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Martin J Thomas; George Peat; Trishna Rathod; Michelle Marshall; Andrew Moore; Hylton B Menz; Edward Roddy Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2015-07-13 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Hylton B Menz; Pazit Levinger; Jade M Tan; Maria Auhl; Edward Roddy; Shannon E Munteanu Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 2.362