BACKGROUND: Tools able to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative chemotherapy might improve treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 783 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and operated at the European Institute of Oncology were used to develop a nomogram using logistic regression model based on both categorical (clinical T and N, HER2/neu, grade and primary therapy) and continuous variables (age, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67 expression and number of chemotherapy courses). The performance of the resulting nomogram was internally evaluated through bootstrapping methods. Finally the model was externally validated on a patient set treated in other institutions and subsequently operated at the EIO. RESULTS: At multivariable analysis the probability of pCR was directly associated with Ki-67 expression (OR for 10% increase in the percentage of positive cells, 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03, 1.29) and number of chemotherapy courses (OR for one cycle increase, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12, 1.53) and inversely associated with ER and PgR expression (ORs for 10% increase in the percentage of positive cells, 0.86, 95% CI 0.79, 0.93 and 0.82, 95% CI 0.69, 0.99, respectively). The nomogram for pCR based on these variables had good discrimination in training as well in validation set (AUC, 0.78 and 0.77). CONCLUSION: The use of a nomogram based on the number of preoperative courses, degree of Ki-67 and steroid hormone receptors expression may be useful for predicting the probability of pCR and for the design of the proper therapeutic algorithm in locally advanced breast cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Tools able to predict pathological complete response (pCR) to preoperative chemotherapy might improve treatment outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 783 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and operated at the European Institute of Oncology were used to develop a nomogram using logistic regression model based on both categorical (clinical T and N, HER2/neu, grade and primary therapy) and continuous variables (age, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67 expression and number of chemotherapy courses). The performance of the resulting nomogram was internally evaluated through bootstrapping methods. Finally the model was externally validated on a patient set treated in other institutions and subsequently operated at the EIO. RESULTS: At multivariable analysis the probability of pCR was directly associated with Ki-67 expression (OR for 10% increase in the percentage of positive cells, 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03, 1.29) and number of chemotherapy courses (OR for one cycle increase, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12, 1.53) and inversely associated with ER and PgR expression (ORs for 10% increase in the percentage of positive cells, 0.86, 95% CI 0.79, 0.93 and 0.82, 95% CI 0.69, 0.99, respectively). The nomogram for pCR based on these variables had good discrimination in training as well in validation set (AUC, 0.78 and 0.77). CONCLUSION: The use of a nomogram based on the number of preoperative courses, degree of Ki-67 and steroid hormone receptors expression may be useful for predicting the probability of pCR and for the design of the proper therapeutic algorithm in locally advanced breast cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Paula Cabrera-Galeana; Wendy Muñoz-Montaño; Fernando Lara-Medina; Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; Victor Pérez-Sánchez; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; R Marisol Quintero; Fany Porras-Reyes; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Ignacio Del Carmen; Alejandro Mohar; Oscar Arrieta Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-02-28
Authors: Gil Binenbaum; Gui-shuang Ying; Graham E Quinn; Stephan Dreiseitl; Karen Karp; Robin S Roberts; Haresh Kirpalani Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: T Fujii; T Kogawa; W Dong; A A Sahin; S Moulder; J K Litton; D Tripathy; T Iwamoto; K K Hunt; L Pusztai; B Lim; Y Shen; N T Ueno Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Hyuk Hur; Min Soo Cho; Woong Sub Koom; Joon Seok Lim; Tae Il Kim; Joong Bae Ahn; Hoguen Kim; Nam Kyu Kim Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: G Allevi; C Strina; D Andreis; V Zanoni; L Bazzola; S Bonardi; C Foroni; M Milani; M R Cappelletti; F Gussago; S Aguggini; R Giardini; M Martinotti; S B Fox; A L Harris; A Bottini; A Berruti; D Generali Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: V Petry; D M Gagliato; A I C Leal; R J Arai; E Longo; F Andrade; M D Ricci; J R Piato; R Barroso-Sousa; P M Hoff; M S Mano Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 2.590