Richard J Siegert1, Wei Gao, Frank H Walkey, Irene J Higginson. 1. King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine at Guy's, King's College and St. Thomas' Hospitals, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. richard.siegert@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
CONTEXT: The Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) is a widely used outcome measure in palliative care research, and has good psychometric properties. It has been used for clinical or research purposes in specialist cancer centers, nursing homes, day hospice units, and hospice settings in a growing number of countries. However, the POS has not yet been examined using factor analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the internal factor structure of the POS. METHODS: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were used for secondary analysis of two existing POS data sets of British patients, most of whom were cancer patients. RESULTS: We began with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which indicated that the POS is not a unidimensional scale. This was followed by an exploratory factor analysis that suggested two factors-one reflecting a psychological well-being dimension and the other consisting of three items relating to the standard of professional care. A similar two-factor structure also was identified in the second sample using CFA. CONCLUSION: The POS appears to capture two factors, psychological status and quality of care, and to have three items that function independently (family anxiety, symptoms, and pain control). Our findings suggest that future evaluations of palliative care services should include assessment not only of symptoms and well-being or quality of life, but also of quality of care, and that unidimensional measures will not capture all relevant aspects in palliative care. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CONTEXT: The Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) is a widely used outcome measure in palliative care research, and has good psychometric properties. It has been used for clinical or research purposes in specialist cancer centers, nursing homes, day hospice units, and hospice settings in a growing number of countries. However, the POS has not yet been examined using factor analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to examine the internal factor structure of the POS. METHODS: Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were used for secondary analysis of two existing POS data sets of British patients, most of whom were cancerpatients. RESULTS: We began with a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), which indicated that the POS is not a unidimensional scale. This was followed by an exploratory factor analysis that suggested two factors-one reflecting a psychological well-being dimension and the other consisting of three items relating to the standard of professional care. A similar two-factor structure also was identified in the second sample using CFA. CONCLUSION: The POS appears to capture two factors, psychological status and quality of care, and to have three items that function independently (family anxiety, symptoms, and pain control). Our findings suggest that future evaluations of palliative care services should include assessment not only of symptoms and well-being or quality of life, but also of quality of care, and that unidimensional measures will not capture all relevant aspects in palliative care. Copyright 2010 U.S. CancerPain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Janneke van Roij; Heidi Fransen; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Myrte Zijlstra; Natasja Raijmakers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: D Steinmann; D Vordermark; H Geinitz; R Aschoff; A Bayerl; J Gerstein; M Hipp; B van Oorschot; H J Wypior; C Schäfer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-11-18 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Barbara Gomes; Paul McCrone; Sue Hall; Julia Riley; Jonathan Koffman; Irene J Higginson Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-06-08 Impact factor: 3.603