Literature DB >> 20471704

Outcome of in-hospital adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation assisted with portable auto-priming percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

Ik Joon Jo1, Tae Gun Shin, Min Sub Sim, Hyoung Gon Song, Yeon Kwon Jeong, Yong-Bien Song, Joo-Yong Hahn, Seung Hyuk Choi, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Eun-Seok Jeon, Wook Sung Kim, Young Tak Lee, Kiick Sung, Jin-Ho Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcome from in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is still unsatisfactory. CPR assisted with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) is expected to improve the outcome of in-hospital CPR.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 83 consecutive cases of adult in-hospital CPR assisted by a portable pre-assembled auto-priming PCPS system (EBS, Terumo, Japan) from January 2004 to December 2007.
RESULTS: PCPS was successfully performed in 97.6% of the patients and could be weaned in 57.8% of the patients. The survival-to-discharge rate was 41.0% with an acceptable neurological status in 85.3% of the patients. The 6-month survival was 38.6%. Survival-to-discharge decreased about 1% for each 1 min increase in the duration of CPR. The probability of survival was about 65%, 45%, and 19% when the duration of CPR was 10, 30, or 60 min, respectively. Multivariate analysis adjusted with clinical factors including organ dysfunction severity scores revealed that defibrillation and CPR duration less than 35 min were independent predictors for both survival-to-discharge (odds ratio=8.0, 95% CI=2.8-23.0, p<0.001) and 6-month survival (hazard ratio=3.3, 95% CI=1.9-5.9, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that CPR assisted with PCPS results in an acceptable survival-to-discharge rate and mid-term prognosis.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20471704     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

1.  Have we averted deaths using venoarterial ECMO?

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Hannah Wunsch; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by severe refractory cardiogenic shock assisted with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

Authors:  Taek Kyu Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Jin-Ho Choi; Kiick Sung; Young Tak Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Sang Hoon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Relationship between Clinical Outcomes and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Time in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Assisted Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Sungsoo Cho; Wonkyung Lee; Seong Hoon Lim; Tae Soo Kang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Clinical Significance of Low-Flow Time in Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Results from the RESCUE Registry.

Authors:  Ik Hyun Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Woo Jin Jang; Woo Jung Chun; Ju Hyeon Oh; Yong Hwan Park; Cheol Woong Yu; Hyun-Joong Kim; Bum Sung Kim; Jin-Ok Jeong; Hyun Jong Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.