OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In many patients hemodynamics are normalized early after surgical intervention. However, the effect of residual pulmonary hypertension on postoperative clinical status and survival is unknown. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy in a continuous national series between 1997 and December 2007. Postoperatively, patients underwent scheduled reinvestigation, including functional testing and right heart catheterization, at 3 months after the operation. They were divided into 2 groups based on mean pulmonary artery pressure: group 1, less than 30 mm Hg; group 2, 30 mm Hg or greater. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen patients underwent pulmonary endarterectomy, survived to hospital discharge, and completed the 3-month follow-up period. At 3 months after pulmonary endarterectomy, there was a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure for the whole cohort (48±12 to 26±10 mm Hg, P<.001). However, 31% of the patients had residual pulmonary hypertension. Group 1 patients enjoyed significantly better exercise capacity and improved symptoms compared with group 2 patients. In addition, there were significantly fewer patients receiving targeted medical therapy in group 1 versus group 2 (0% vs 25%, P<.001). Conditional survival after discharge from the hospital for the whole cohort was 90.0% at 5 years and was not different between groups (90.3% for group 1 vs 89.9% for group 2, P=.36). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy, survival after hospital discharge is excellent. Residual pulmonary hypertension significantly compromised symptom status and functional capacity but did not appear to adversely affect medium-term survival. The effect of targeted medical therapy in patients with residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy needs to be evaluated further. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. In many patients hemodynamics are normalized early after surgical intervention. However, the effect of residual pulmonary hypertension on postoperative clinical status and survival is unknown. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy in a continuous national series between 1997 and December 2007. Postoperatively, patients underwent scheduled reinvestigation, including functional testing and right heart catheterization, at 3 months after the operation. They were divided into 2 groups based on mean pulmonary artery pressure: group 1, less than 30 mm Hg; group 2, 30 mm Hg or greater. RESULTS: Three hundred fourteen patients underwent pulmonary endarterectomy, survived to hospital discharge, and completed the 3-month follow-up period. At 3 months after pulmonary endarterectomy, there was a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure for the whole cohort (48±12 to 26±10 mm Hg, P<.001). However, 31% of the patients had residual pulmonary hypertension. Group 1 patients enjoyed significantly better exercise capacity and improved symptoms compared with group 2 patients. In addition, there were significantly fewer patients receiving targeted medical therapy in group 1 versus group 2 (0% vs 25%, P<.001). Conditional survival after discharge from the hospital for the whole cohort was 90.0% at 5 years and was not different between groups (90.3% for group 1 vs 89.9% for group 2, P=.36). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy, survival after hospital discharge is excellent. Residual pulmonary hypertension significantly compromised symptom status and functional capacity but did not appear to adversely affect medium-term survival. The effect of targeted medical therapy in patients with residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy needs to be evaluated further. Copyright Â
Authors: Junjing Su; Alun D Hughes; Ulf Simonsen; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Kim H Parker; Luke S Howard; Soren Mellemkjaer Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: John E Cannon; Li Su; David G Kiely; Kathleen Page; Mark Toshner; Emilia Swietlik; Carmen Treacy; Anie Ponnaberanam; Robin Condliffe; Karen Sheares; Dolores Taboada; John Dunning; Steven Tsui; Choo Ng; Deepa Gopalan; Nicholas Screaton; Charlie Elliot; Simon Gibbs; Luke Howard; Paul Corris; James Lordan; Martin Johnson; Andrew Peacock; Robert MacKenzie-Ross; Benji Schreiber; Gerry Coghlan; Kostas Dimopoulos; Stephen J Wort; Sean Gaine; Shahin Moledina; David P Jenkins; Joanna Pepke-Zaba Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Robert V MacKenzie Ross; Mark R Toshner; Elaine Soon; Robert Naeije; Joanna Pepke-Zaba Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Karen M Olsson; Bernhard Meyer; Jan Hinrichs; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Marius M Hoeper; Serghei Cebotari Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Bastiaan E Schölzel; Martijn C Post; Alexander van de Bruaene; Steven Dymarkowski; Wim Wuyts; Bart Meyns; Werner Budts; Marion Delcroix Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Henning Gall; Ioana R Preston; Barbara Hinzmann; Sabina Heinz; David Jenkins; Nick H Kim; Irene Lang Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.017