Literature DB >> 20470807

Event-related potential correlates of declarative and non-declarative sequence knowledge.

Nicola K Ferdinand1, Dennis Rünger, Peter A Frensch, Axel Mecklinger.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to demonstrate that declarative and non-declarative knowledge acquired in an incidental sequence learning task contributes differentially to memory retrieval and leads to dissociable ERP signatures in a recognition memory task. For this purpose, participants performed a sequence learning task and were classified as verbalizers, partial verbalizers, or nonverbalizers according to their ability to verbally report the systematic response sequence. Thereafter, ERPs were recorded in a recognition memory task time-locked to sequence triplets that were either part of the previously learned sequence or not. Although all three groups executed old sequence triplets faster than new triplets in the recognition memory task, qualitatively distinct ERP patterns were found for participants with and without reportable knowledge. Verbalizers and, to a lesser extent, partial verbalizers showed an ERP correlate of recollection for parts of the incidentally learned sequence. In contrast, nonverbalizers showed a different ERP effect with a reverse polarity that might reflect priming. This indicates that an ensemble of qualitatively different processes is at work when declarative and non-declarative sequence knowledge is retrieved. By this, our findings favor a multiple-systems view postulating that explicit and implicit learning are supported by different and functionally independent systems. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20470807     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Cognitive foundations of organizational learning: re-introducing the distinction between declarative and non-declarative knowledge.

Authors:  Barbara Kump; Johannes Moskaliuk; Ulrike Cress; Joachim Kimmerle
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Functional differences between statistical learning with and without explicit training.

Authors:  Laura J Batterink; Paul J Reber; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Implicit versus explicit local contextual processing.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Statistical learning under incidental versus intentional conditions.

Authors:  Joanne Arciuli; Janne von Koss Torkildsen; David J Stevens; Ian C Simpson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-10

Review 5.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us?

Authors:  Jerome Daltrozzo; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.