AIMS: The clinical relevance of frequent methylation of CpG islands of key cancer genes in breast cancer is being increasingly recognized. Our study aimed to evaluate the promoter methylation status of DNA repair genes-BRCA1MGMT and GSTP1 in tumor and circulating DNA of invasive ductal breast carcinoma patients. MAIN METHODS: Methylation-specific PCR was carried out to investigate the promoter methylation status of genes in tumor and circulating DNA of 100 breast cancer patients in a prospective study. The effect of promoter methylation on protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. KEY FINDINGS: The frequency of tumor hypermethylation was 27% in BRCA1, 32% in MGMT and 25% in GSTP1 and correlated with methylation of these genes in paired serum DNA. Immunohistochemical analysis showed no detectable expression of BRCA1 and MGMT in 51/89 (57%) and 35/89 (39%) tumors, respectively. MGMT promoter methylation mediated gene silencing was associated with loss of its protein expression (p=0.002, O.R.=4.5, 95% C.I.=1.7-12.0). BRCA1 promoter methylation was not associated with loss of its protein expression, indicating that methylation is not the sole mechanism accounting for the loss/reduced BRCA1 protein expression. Importantly, GSTP1 and BRCA1 hypermethylation were found to be independent of other prognostic factors in predicting disease recurrence (p=0.02, HR=7.6, 95% C.I.=1.4-44.1; p=0.04, HR=6.2, 95% C.I.=1.1-35.7). SIGNIFICANCE: Our study underscores the potential utility of DNA methylation of these genes in serum as a promising biomarker and can serve as a surrogate for tumor DNA methylation for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The clinical relevance of frequent methylation of CpG islands of key cancer genes in breast cancer is being increasingly recognized. Our study aimed to evaluate the promoter methylation status of DNA repair genes-BRCA1MGMT and GSTP1 in tumor and circulating DNA of invasive ductal breast carcinomapatients. MAIN METHODS: Methylation-specific PCR was carried out to investigate the promoter methylation status of genes in tumor and circulating DNA of 100 breast cancerpatients in a prospective study. The effect of promoter methylation on protein expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. KEY FINDINGS: The frequency of tumor hypermethylation was 27% in BRCA1, 32% in MGMT and 25% in GSTP1 and correlated with methylation of these genes in paired serum DNA. Immunohistochemical analysis showed no detectable expression of BRCA1 and MGMT in 51/89 (57%) and 35/89 (39%) tumors, respectively. MGMT promoter methylation mediated gene silencing was associated with loss of its protein expression (p=0.002, O.R.=4.5, 95% C.I.=1.7-12.0). BRCA1 promoter methylation was not associated with loss of its protein expression, indicating that methylation is not the sole mechanism accounting for the loss/reduced BRCA1 protein expression. Importantly, GSTP1 and BRCA1 hypermethylation were found to be independent of other prognostic factors in predicting disease recurrence (p=0.02, HR=7.6, 95% C.I.=1.4-44.1; p=0.04, HR=6.2, 95% C.I.=1.1-35.7). SIGNIFICANCE: Our study underscores the potential utility of DNA methylation of these genes in serum as a promising biomarker and can serve as a surrogate for tumor DNA methylation for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Yoon Hee Cho; Jing Shen; Marilie D Gammon; Yu-Jing Zhang; Qiao Wang; Karina Gonzalez; Xinran Xu; Patrick T Bradshaw; Susan L Teitelbaum; Gail Garbowski; Hanina Hibshoosh; Alfred I Neugut; Jia Chen; Regina M Santella Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Catherine L Callahan; Youjin Wang; Catalin Marian; Daniel Y Weng; Kevin H Eng; Meng-Hua Tao; Christine B Ambrosone; Jing Nie; Maurizio Trevisan; Dominic Smiraglia; Stephen B Edge; Peter G Shields; Jo L Freudenheim Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Jolien S de Groot; Xiaojuan Pan; Jan Meeldijk; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi; Brock C Christensen; Devin C Koestler; E Andres Houseman; Alan R Schned; Margaret R Karagas; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 2.506