Literature DB >> 2047066

Cervical effacement: variation in belief among clinicians.

W L Holcomb1, J S Smeltzer.   

Abstract

Cervical effacement may be described as a percentage or as residual cervical length in centimeters. For effective communication among clinicians, the percentage method requires agreement about the length of the uneffaced cervix. Variation in beliefs regarding cervical effacement and length was assessed among practicing obstetricians at a single medical center. The mean estimate for the length of the uneffaced cervix at term was 2.47 +/- 0.64 cm, with a range of 1-4 cm and a coefficient of variation of 26%. The mean estimate of physicians in private practice was significantly shorter (P less than .001) than that of faculty and house staff combined. There is the potential for miscommunication among physicians based on variation in beliefs about effacement. Adoption of the metric system for description of the cervix would eliminate hidden assumptions about cervical length and the concept of effacement.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2047066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Predicting spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  David F Colombo
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

Review 2.  Use of uterine electromyography to diagnose term and preterm labor.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Preterm prediction study: comparison of the cervical score and Bishop score for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery.

Authors:  R B Newman; R L Goldenberg; J D Iams; P J Meis; B M Mercer; A H Moawad; E Thom; M Miodovnik; S N Caritis; M Dombrowski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Pre-induction translabial ultrasound measurements in predicting mode of delivery compared to bishop score: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Soghra Khazardoost; Fahimeh Ghotbizadeh Vahdani; Sahar Latifi; Sedighe Borna; Maryam Tahani; Mohammad Ali Rezaei; Masoomeh Shafaat
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Assessment of parturition with cervical light-induced fluorescence and uterine electromyography.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 2.238

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.